2021
DOI: 10.1080/03098265.2021.2001793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An introduction to the co-creation of policy briefs with youth and academic teams

Abstract: Drawing on insights from a four-day online workshop, which explored geo-engineering and policy making with 13 youth participants, an academic and youth authorial team provide a guide to the cocreation of policy briefs. Drawing on excerpts from the policy brief at different stages of development and commentary provided by the authors during the workshops, we set out four stages including (1) Identifying the key message and audience, (2) Reading and critically engaging with examples of policy briefs during the d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participatory online workshops with young people from across Europe were facilitated by a team drawn from disciplines including education, philosophy, and policy. A key output of the workshops is a Geoengineering Youth Guide and Policy Brief [38][39][40]. During the workshops participants were able to learn about a range of geo-engineering approaches, including carbon geoengineering (such as ocean liming, ocean fertilisation, and carbon capture and storage) and solar geoengineering (including space mirrors and cloud thinning) [38].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participatory online workshops with young people from across Europe were facilitated by a team drawn from disciplines including education, philosophy, and policy. A key output of the workshops is a Geoengineering Youth Guide and Policy Brief [38][39][40]. During the workshops participants were able to learn about a range of geo-engineering approaches, including carbon geoengineering (such as ocean liming, ocean fertilisation, and carbon capture and storage) and solar geoengineering (including space mirrors and cloud thinning) [38].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These activities include (1) sharing perceptions regarding increasing commitment and vision of activities [13]; (2) brainstorming regarding division of tasks and synergy in scientific fields [14]; (3) a workshop on policy briefs about policies and central issues in matching fund programs [15]; (4) training of trainers (TOT) in scientific fields that are in accordance with creativity [16]; (5) training in scientific fields that are suitable for students; (6) mentoring and monitoring activities for students who have taken part in TOT, and ( 7) develop terms of reference (TOR) with the partner.…”
Section: Strengthening Work Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAE was thus felt to be the only approach that would respect and capture this co-creation. Importantly, as strong advocates for youth, utilising an approach that fully foregrounds and values youth contributions as full co-creators and co-researchers (Cutter-Mackenzie & Rousell 2019) also recognises that 'authorial responsibility' provides the youth a further opportunity for 'action' (through authorship) (Dunlop et al 2021). At this point, it is important to clarify that the choice of the term lifeworlds throughout relates directly to both the method of CAE but also importantly about what this process enabled access to, youth's accounts of their own experiences.…”
Section: Collaborative Autoethnographymentioning
confidence: 99%