2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40271-013-0041-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Introduction to Item Response Theory for Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement

Abstract: The growing emphasis on patient-centered care has accelerated the demand for high-quality data from patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Traditionally, the development and validation of these measures has been guided by classical test theory. However, item response theory (IRT), an alternate measurement framework, offers promise for addressing practical measurement problems found in health-related research that have been difficult to solve through classical methods. This paper introduces foundational conce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
309
0
12

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(328 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
309
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…There is thus an obvious need to develop effective and adequate methods to obtain more extensive PROM information that can be delivered to the registry. To meet this demand, SKaPa has initiated projects for further development of PROM in dentistry based on modern concepts of item response theory and the experience of PROMIS ® .…”
Section: Examples Of Data Output Related To the Objectives For Skapamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is thus an obvious need to develop effective and adequate methods to obtain more extensive PROM information that can be delivered to the registry. To meet this demand, SKaPa has initiated projects for further development of PROM in dentistry based on modern concepts of item response theory and the experience of PROMIS ® .…”
Section: Examples Of Data Output Related To the Objectives For Skapamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key difference between the approaches is that CTT and IRT typically describe a set of data, whereas RMT aims to obtain data that fit the model. A fuller description of the three paradigms can be found elsewhere (CTT [6,[11][12][13], RMT [14][15][16][17][18][19], IRT [20][21][22][23][24]). In addition, Table 1 provides additional background and comparisons across the approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages that IRT and Rasch modeling confer over Classical Test Theory are well documented [20, 24, 25]. In particular, there are four key advantages to using these methods to construct and refine HL measures [26].…”
Section: Limitations Of Validation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%