Variable Stars as Essential Astrophysical Tools 2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-4299-1_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Introduction to Helioseismology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 232 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the interior model, we used the OPAL opacities (Iglesias & Rogers 1996) that were extended to low temperatures with the opacities of Alexander & Ferguson (1994) and the CEFF equation of state (Christensen-Dalsgaard & Däppen 1992). The metallicity was assumed to be Z = 0.02 for the metal mixture derived by Grevesse & Noels (1993).…”
Section: Physical Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the interior model, we used the OPAL opacities (Iglesias & Rogers 1996) that were extended to low temperatures with the opacities of Alexander & Ferguson (1994) and the CEFF equation of state (Christensen-Dalsgaard & Däppen 1992). The metallicity was assumed to be Z = 0.02 for the metal mixture derived by Grevesse & Noels (1993).…”
Section: Physical Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equilibrium stellar models were computed with the evolutionary code CLÉS (Code Liégeois d'Évolution Stellaire) that uses: standard MLT for convection calculations; the OPAL opacities (Iglesias & Rogers 1996) completed at low temperatures with the opacities of Alexander & Ferguson (1994); the CEFF equation of state (Christensen-Dalsgaard & Däppen 1992); and the atmosphere models of Kurucz (1998) as boundary conditions. All the models of this study have a chemical composition given by: (X = 0.7, Z = 0.02) and a convective core overshooting parameter α ov = 0.2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of this discrepancy may be resolved by altering the diffusion-produced composition profile at the base of the convection zone, perhaps through changes in the diffusion coefficients, or mixing due to differential rotation or gravity modes (see, e.g., [6], [29]). Several studies have shown that much of the discrepancy below the convection zone can be removed by a prescribed change in the opacity profile of 1 to ~5% [26,27], well within the uncertainties in opacity calculations. Calculations have been done including the effects of radiative levitation of individual elements in addition to diffusive settling; these calculations show that radiative levitation effects are quite small, amounting to a change of only 0.5% in opacity due to the different resulting element distribution, and a change of 0.06% in sound speed below the convection zone [30].…”
Section: Comments On Other Sources Of Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This diffusion is very slow, and impeded by the convective mixing in the envelope; however, during the Sun's 4.5 billion-year lifetime, about 10 percent of the initial helium and ~8 percent of the surface heavier elements can settle from the convection zone. This diffusion has a significant effect on the Sun's structure (see, e.g., [5], [6], [26]). …”
Section: Solar Evolution Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%