2016
DOI: 10.3726/978-3-653-06323-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Introduction to Fictional Worlds Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the Lewisian approach, the act of pretense involves possible worlds semantics. This model has been influential in both the analytic philosophy of fiction and contemporary narratology and it has been employed to a large extent in discussions of logically impossible fictions by authors such as (Alber 2016, Badura and Berto 2019, Doležel 1998, Fořt 2016, Priest 1997, Ryan 2019 The law of non-contradiction (LNC) is, according to Aristotle's famous definition, "firmest of all" logical laws and "non-hypothetical": it asserts that for all propositions of the type p and ∼p to be true "simultaneously and in the same respect is [absolutely] impossible" (Metaphysics Г 1005b15-20). There is no possible world in which ∼(p ∧ ∼p) does not obtain: the LNC is "true at all members of any set of worlds, and so is true in every fiction" (Hanley 2004, 117) since fictions are descriptions of possible, unactualized states of affairs.…”
Section: The Principle Of Poetic Licence (Ppl) Vs the Law Of Non-cont...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Lewisian approach, the act of pretense involves possible worlds semantics. This model has been influential in both the analytic philosophy of fiction and contemporary narratology and it has been employed to a large extent in discussions of logically impossible fictions by authors such as (Alber 2016, Badura and Berto 2019, Doležel 1998, Fořt 2016, Priest 1997, Ryan 2019 The law of non-contradiction (LNC) is, according to Aristotle's famous definition, "firmest of all" logical laws and "non-hypothetical": it asserts that for all propositions of the type p and ∼p to be true "simultaneously and in the same respect is [absolutely] impossible" (Metaphysics Г 1005b15-20). There is no possible world in which ∼(p ∧ ∼p) does not obtain: the LNC is "true at all members of any set of worlds, and so is true in every fiction" (Hanley 2004, 117) since fictions are descriptions of possible, unactualized states of affairs.…”
Section: The Principle Of Poetic Licence (Ppl) Vs the Law Of Non-cont...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, Hernández Ruiz (2022, 2023 has elaborated on Albaladejo Mayordomo's (1998) semantic theory of possible worlds by adding three articulatory subworlds (ethical, aesthetic and religious) to those already proposed for each character (feared, pretended, desired, believed, etc.). Taking a broader approach, Fort (2016), while remaining close to the logical-analytical principles found in Dolezel (1998) or Ryan, is critical of them and seeks theoretical support from more hermeneutic authors, such as Pavel.…”
Section: Possible Worlds From a Phenomenological-existential Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the study of theories of possible worlds has turned its attention to fictional narrative in media other than literature, such as video games, developments in artificial intelligence, the internet, or the interactivity of multiple receivers, among others. The work in Spain of Antonio Planells, Manuel Asensi, as well as outside its borders, carried out by authors such as Jan Alber, 2016;Alice Bell, 2010 andPhillip Bricker, 2008;Warren Buckland, 2004;Daniel Dohrn, 2009;Bohumil Fořt, 2016;Françoise Lavocat, 2010;Elizabeth Swift, 2016;Nele Uhl, 2013;Jan Van Looy, 2005;Salome Voegelin, 2014, Mak Wolf, 2012 y 2020, among the most recent ones, is noteworthy.…”
Section: Possible Worlds Brief Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%