2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20735-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Introduction to Differential Manifolds

Abstract: The aim of Grenoble Sciences is twofold: to produce works corresponding to a clearly defined project, without the constraints of trends nor curriculum, to ensure the utmost scientific and pedagogic quality of the selected works: each project is selected by Grenoble Sciences with the help of anonymous referees. In order to optimize the work, the authors interact for a year (on average) with the members of a reading committee, whose names figure in the front pages of the work, which is then co-published with the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. This is a variation of the standard Morse Lemma with the same proof, using Moser's trick, see [12], Theorem 3.44. It is sufficient to check that the solution provided by the proof has the properties required by the lemma.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof. This is a variation of the standard Morse Lemma with the same proof, using Moser's trick, see [12], Theorem 3.44. It is sufficient to check that the solution provided by the proof has the properties required by the lemma.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…As y 1 = y 6 , y 2 = y 3 and y 4 = y 5 this already gives B(z ′ ) ≤ A(z), by triangular inequalities. 12 2 for i = 1, 2 and d(x ′ i , y i ) ≤ a 56 2 for i = 5, 6 directly yield, by triangle inequalities, B(z ′ ) ≤ 5 6 A(z).…”
Section: Proofs Of the Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In this section we present some standards results of differential geometry. An interested reader can find more on this subject in [29]. The Lemmas 1 and 3 are proved in Section 5.2.…”
Section: Submanifoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prove Lemma 1 notice that by [29,Theorem 1.21] there is Ṽ Ă R d a neighborhood of zero, U 1 Ă U a neighborhood of y and φ : V Ñ U 1 a C p diffeomorphism such that φpx 1 , . .…”
Section: Proof Of Lemmas 1 Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaving aside the so-called 'trivial' manifolds diffeomorphic to S 3 , the remaining possibilities consist of an infinite list of nontrivial manifolds, each of which is diffeomorphic to a finite connected sum of the following form [5,6,25] (11) where k, l, and m are non-negative integers satisfying k + l + m ≥ 1 and if either k, l or m equals to zero, then terms of that type do not occur. Here each Γ k (for k ≥ 1) is a nontrivial ( = I) subgroup of SO(4) acting freely and properly discontinuously on S 3 and the resulting manifold is S 3 /Γ k (see [22] and [23] for free and properly discontinuous actions). S 2 × S 1 denotes the wormhole and supports only anisotropic (even locally) homogeneous metrics and therefore is not compatible with the cosmological observations.…”
Section: Adm Formalism With a Matter Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%