An Introduction to Conversation Analysis

Liddicoat, Anthony J.

doi:10.5040/9781350090675

Cited by 48 publications

(78 citation statements)

References 280 publications

(692 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Like UBL, the EMCA approach to the study of language also foregrounds language use. However, EMCA—coming as it does out of sociology—is broader in analytic scope, investigating the mundane social organization in a wide range of contexts focusing on the processes of social interaction and, particularly, the ways that participants’ hold one another accountable for producing meaningful verbalized and embodied actions (Liddicoat, 2011; Maynard & Clayman, 2003). In order to observe this accountability, analysts make detailed transcriptions of spoken interaction displaying the unfolding sequences of turns that participants use to contextualize and interpret their interaction.…”

Section: Ethnomethodological Conversation Analysis: Co‐constructed Co...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaborative Mobilizations of Interbodied Communication for Cooperative Action

Hellermann

Thorne

2022

The Modern Language Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Drawing on usage‐based approaches to the study of language learning—including recent research on mobility in interaction, embodied approaches to cognition and communicative action, and innovations in place‐based language learning in the wild—this article uses methods from ethnomethodological conversation analysis to investigate video recordings of 3 English language learners playing an augmented reality game that advocated for environmental stewardship. The analysis focused on 1 aspect of the game, an oral report about different green technologies, which was repeated 3 times due to technical difficulties. Analysis reveals emergent interactional dynamics that included (a) the use and creative reuse of multiword expressions, and (b) aligned interbodied cooperative practices that together supported (c) the building of a discourse structure for making oral reports that were part of the game narrative. The analysis highlights the semipermeable, collaboratively produced, and emergent nature of grammar for social action. Implications for pedagogy include (a) the consideration of structured unpredictability in language task design, and (b) a (re)conceptualization of language structure and language development as both an individual and group achievement.

show abstract

Section: Ethnomethodological Conversation Analysis: Co‐constructed Co...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaborative Mobilizations of Interbodied Communication for Cooperative Action

Hellermann

Thorne

2022

The Modern Language Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This includes how people stay engaged and how they talk a conversation. According to Liddicoat (2007), "one of the most noticeable features of conversation is that speakers change." Relating to the study of turn taking, CA methods attempt to record and explain how participants can understand to one another's action during their backand-forth interaction and how they set up their turns to respond to previous turn(s) (Drew, 2005).…”

Section: Conversation Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

An Analysis of Turn Taking Strategies Used by Lecturers and Students Through Online Class

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study deals with turn taking strategies. The study aims to investigate the types of turn taking strategies used by lecturers ans students, to find out how turn taking strategy realized and to identify the dominant types used by lecturers and students. This studey uses descriptive qualitative research design which employed two data collection techniques, i.e. observation and video recording. The number of data that containing types of turn taking strategy is 200 data. The data are, then, analyzed by using theory from Strenstrom (2001). Techniques of analyzing data is by classifying the data based on their types, then the data will be count in each category to make the analysis more comprehensive by knowing which category ranks the highest and vice versa. Finally the result will be put in findings. The results of the research indicates that: the dominant type used by lecturers in semantics class, kajian budaya and technology of translation, are prompting strategy, meanwhile in akustik dan organologi class, the lecturer used taking over and prompting strategy as the dominant types. Meanwhile the students used the same dominant types in four different class, they are taking over strategy. While the types that is not used at all in four different classes are the silent pause strategy and giving up strategy.

show abstract

Section: A Summonsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A summons is a derivation of the pre-sequence, which is not designed in reference to the prior interaction but is used to introduce any sort of talk (Liddicoat, 2007). The summons and answer sequence is a kind of pre-sequence that is designed to draw the attention of recipients (Liddicoat, 2007). Schegloff (2007) writes that 'there is one type of presequence which is not directed to any sequence type in particular, but rather is aimed at a feature generically relevant to the efficacy of talk-in-interactionthe attention, or mobilised recipiency, of an interlocutor' (p. 48).…”

Section: A Summonsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…When the UP provides the reason for the heckle, the CP thus has an idea of what the UP will talk about. In ordinary conversations, the summons and answer sequence occurs in two pairs; the FPP and the SPP (Liddicoat, 2007;Schegloff, 2007). The speaker produces a summons, such as 'Ahmad', and the other speaker acknowledges the summons through a token such as 'yeah' or possibly a redirection of eye contact.…”

Section: A Summonsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Heckling in Parliamentary Interactions

Alqatawna

2022

tpls

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper aims to describe and discuss the phenomenon of gaining illegal speakership in the Jordanian parliament with reference to the application of conversation analysis (CA), the participation framework, the notion of activity type, the notion of participation framework patterns, and the forms of embodiment and social organisation. The use of these strands enabled a fine-gained analysis of the ways in which hecklers enter the interaction, what they do with the floor and how other participants respond to these incursions. This study also shows how allotting certain roles in institutional contexts impacts people’s rights to speak and how they can disobey the rules to become speaking participants.

show abstract

An Introduction to Conversation Analysis

Abstract: How to cite:Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it.

Cited by 48 publications

References 280 publications

Collaborative Mobilizations of Interbodied Communication for Cooperative Action

Collaborative Mobilizations of Interbodied Communication for Cooperative Action

An Analysis of Turn Taking Strategies Used by Lecturers and Students Through Online Class

Heckling in Parliamentary Interactions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About