2000
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.114.3.594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An intrinsic source of behavioral regulation that influences discrete responses to cues important for the initiation of suckling.

Abstract: The present experiment investigated the relationship between motor activity and oral grasping of an artificial nipple in newborn rats. Pups orally grasped the artificial nipple, and they performed more and longer oral grasps in the latter portion of the nipple presentation. Motor activity was cyclical, and this cyclicity was evident before and during presentation of the artificial nipple. The onset of an oral grasp response was preceded by a period of relatively low motor activity, and the termination of a gra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pattern of motor activity around oral grasp responses in the not-warmed pups during the last minutes of the observation was the same as that observed in previous work with a directly comparable design (Bacher et al, 2000). That is, motor activity was lower before the grasp than during the grasp, and activity during the grasp was lower than activity after the grasp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The pattern of motor activity around oral grasp responses in the not-warmed pups during the last minutes of the observation was the same as that observed in previous work with a directly comparable design (Bacher et al, 2000). That is, motor activity was lower before the grasp than during the grasp, and activity during the grasp was lower than activity after the grasp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The tip of the AN was not forced into the pup's mouth (Petrov et al, 1997;Smotherman, Goffman, et al, 1997). Presenting the AN to the pup did not produce detectable artifacts in the output of the movement sensor (Bacher et al, 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It makes sense that early olfactory experiences would primarily promote later appetitive (versus consummatory) behaviors in the presence of this odor because olfactory cues help orient the pup toward its food source. Increased motor activation, however, was not likely a direct cause of the decreased latency, because activity tends to decrease just before attachment to a nipple (Bacher, Robertson, & Smotherman, 2000). In contrast with the present findings, odors familiar to the infant rat such as amniotic fluid or maternally derived odors have been found to reduce motor activity upon reexposure (Dominguez, Lopez, & Molina, 1998; Schapiro & Salas, 1970).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fetal sheep, CM is sensitive to the spontaneous uterine contractions that normally occur during the last third of gestation, similar to Braxton-Hicks contractions in humans (Robertson et al, 1996). In the rat, CM is influenced by fetal exposure to cocaine (Simonik, Robinson, & Smotherman, 1994), and regulates behavioral responsiveness to perioral stimulation before and after birth (Bacher, Robertson, & Smotherman, 2000;MacLennan, Smotherman, & Robertson, 1998;Reilly, Robertson, MacLennan, & Smotherman, 1997). After birth in humans, CM is sensitive to sound and tightly coupled to visual attention Robertson, Bacher, & Huntington, 2001), and it appears to regulate social interaction with an adult (Huntington, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%