An intervention targeting fundamental values among caregivers at residential facilities: effects of a cluster-randomized controlled trial on residents’ self-reported empowerment, person-centered climate and life satisfaction

Abstract

BackgroundIn Sweden the national fundamental values for care of older people state that care should ensure that they can live in dignity and with a sense of well-being. Our hypothesis was that a caregiver intervention targeting the national fundamental values would improve perceived empowerment, person-centered climate and life satisfaction among older people living in residential facilities.MethodsThe study was a cluster-randomized controlled trial with a pre- and one post-test design, conducted in 27 units (17 study units) at 12 residential facilities for older people in five municipalities in central Sweden. The units in each municipality were randomly assigned to intervention or control group. The caregiver intervention was carried out using an interpretative approach with eight guided face-to-face seminars, where self-reflection and dialogue were used. Data were collected using questionnaires. The number of residents was 43 (78 %) in the intervention group and 37 (71 %) in the control group. The Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U-tests were performed to detect differences between groups and Wilcoxon signed rank tests to explore differences in change over time within groups. Furthermore, generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were used to study effects of the intervention controlling for clustering effects.ResultsPrimary outcome measures were empowerment, person-centered climate and life satisfaction. In the intervention group, improvements at follow-up were found in residents’ self-reported empowerment (n = 42; p = 0.001, Median difference 4.0, 95 % CI 1.5;6.0), person-centered climate (n = 42; p ≤0.001, Median difference 8.0, 95 % CI 4.5;11.4) and life satisfaction regarding the factor quality of everyday activities (n = 40; p = 0.033, Median difference 9.7, 95 % CI 1.0;21.9) while disempowerment decreased (n = 43; p = 0.018, Median difference -1.3, 95 % CI -2.0;0.0). In the control group person-centered climate decreased (n = 37; p = 0.002, Median difference -8.5, 95 % CI -13.6;-3.0) and quality of everyday activities (n = 36; p = 0.012, Median difference -11.6, 95 % CI-21.7;-3.4). Change over time between groups was significant for empowerment (p = 0.001, Median difference 6.0, 95 % CI 3.0;9.0), disempowerment (p = 0.006, Median difference -2.0, 95 % CI -4.0;-1.0) and person-centered climate (p ≤ 0.001, Median difference 16.0, 95 % CI 9.7;23.0) and for life satisfaction regarding the factor quality of everyday activities (p = 0.002, Median difference 22.1, 95 % CI 8.2;37.4). Results of GEE confirmed earlier results; revealed interaction effects for empowerment (parameter estimate -5.0, 95 % CI -8.3;-1.8), person-centered climate (parameter estimate -16.7, 95 % CI -22.4;-10.9) and life satisfaction regarding the factor quality of everyday activities (parameter estimate -25.9, 95 % CI -40.3;-11.5).ConclusionWhen the Swedish national fundamental values were put into practice increases in empowerment, person-centered climate and quality of everyday activities were found among older people with intact co...

Dignity-conserving care for persons with palliative care needs — identifying outcomes studied in research: An integrative review

“…Persons with palliative care needs have also reported feeling appreciative about their accomplishments and about important people in their life (Hall et al, 2012), supporting the idea that gratitude could be an important outcome for them. Furthermore, empowerment has been defined as “a process of promoting and enhancing people's ability to meet their own needs and to mobilize the resources necessary to feel control over their lives” (Roos et al, 2016, p. 2). It has been described that a sense of control contributes to enhancing a person's dignity (Guo and Jacelon, 2014), and perceived loss of control is a risk factor for losing dignity (Monforte et al, 2018).…”

<p>Managers’ experiences of ethical problems in municipal elderly care: a qualitative study of written reflections as part of leadership training</p>

“…It is also important that the staff members’ focus is not just on getting the work done2 but also on gaining the older patient’s trust. Ethical, caring actions should be carried out based on a need to accomplish the primary task and to provide good health care 17. The participation of older patients can be supported by the staff, whose individual perspectives can be called upon to create secure relationships 18.…”

Relationships among person-centered care, nursing home adjustment, and life satisfaction: a cross-sectional survey study

“…Since older adults have their own unique criteria for a good life, a global judgment of life satisfaction may be useful to assess residents' psychological outcomes by allowing individuals to prioritize domains of their lives based on their own values, goals, and concerns. A recent national-level, cluster-randomized controlled trial in Sweden identified that new national fundamental values for the care of older adults had a significant effect on life satisfaction (Roos et al, 2016). These values focus on ensuring that residents are treated with dignity and with a sense of wellbeing in long-term care facilities, which is very similar to the core components of person-centered care.…”