2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An interval subdividing based method for geometric calibration of cone-beam CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, f (h) reaches the maximum value when the second solution is chosen. Considering that the resolution of flatpanel detector is the width of one detector pixel (denoted by d pixel ), we assert that there is no geometry artifacts existing in reconstruction images if the maximum value of f (h) is lower than the width of one detector pixel [18,19]. As a consequence, h max can be expressed as a function with respect to variables n 1 and n 2 by letting f (h) = d pixel and substituting the second solution in Eq.…”
Section: Segmentation Methods Of Ascending Path In Helical Scanmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, f (h) reaches the maximum value when the second solution is chosen. Considering that the resolution of flatpanel detector is the width of one detector pixel (denoted by d pixel ), we assert that there is no geometry artifacts existing in reconstruction images if the maximum value of f (h) is lower than the width of one detector pixel [18,19]. As a consequence, h max can be expressed as a function with respect to variables n 1 and n 2 by letting f (h) = d pixel and substituting the second solution in Eq.…”
Section: Segmentation Methods Of Ascending Path In Helical Scanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first place, the FDK algorithm is computationally efficient and can give satisfactory results when the cone angle of X-ray source is smaller than 10 degrees. Secondly, geometric calibration for circular scan has been well solved by researchers [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. In these methods, Noo's analytic method [8] is a classical method for circular scan which uses the parameters of two ellipses that are the projected images of two circles to determine the geometry parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods have been proposed for CT geometric calibration [1,2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11] , most of these methods require special manufactured calibration phantom for calculating the geometric parameters [5][6][7][8][9] . Noo et al [5] proposed an analytic method based on identification of ellipse parameters, they use the ellipse parameters as intermediate parameters to calculate the CT geometric parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, Kingston et al proposed a method based on the sharpness of reconstructed image maximization to obtain the sharpest three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction. [10] Very recently, a practical and robust method based on interval subdividing was researched by Tan et al [11] As is well known, reconstruction of an image with only the geometric artifacts is necessary for all self-calibration methods. Thus, selfcalibration for interior tomography is more difficult than that for global tomography because of the presence of projection data truncation artifacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
The interior tomography is commonly met in practice, whereas the self-calibration method for geometric parameters remains far from explored. To determine the geometry of interior tomography, a modified interval subdividing based method, which was originally developed by Tan et al, [11] was presented in this paper. For the self-calibration method, it is necessary to obtain the reconstructed image with only geometric artifacts.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%