An interprofessional training program for intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: model build-up and assessment

Chang, Yu‐Che; Chou, Li Fang; Lin, Hui-Ling; Huang, Sheng‐Teng; Shih, Mei-Chuan; Wu, Mao-Chang; Wu, Chiao-Lin; Chen, Pin-Tarng; Chaou, Chung-Hsien

doi:10.1080/13561820.2018.1560247

Cited by 10 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The searches yielded 1712 unique records of which 1505 were excluded during title and abstract review. Following full text review of the remaining 207 papers, 187 were excluded based on reasons listed in Fig 1. Ultimately, the search yielded 20 papers [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] reporting on 19 studies. One study was reported in two papers [49,50].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The retained studies were published between 2009 and 2020 (see Table 1). Studies were conducted in Australia [39], Belgium [55], France [56], Germany [40,57], New Zealand [41], United States [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]54], Singapore [58], and Taiwan [53]. Key study characteristics are presented in Table 1 and outlined below.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Gender of patients reported as approximately half for women [46] in one study and mostly men in one study [54]. Gender was not reported for providers in 6 studies [39,41,46,[49][50][51]53].…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 88%

“…Studies were conducted in acute care in-patient settings including the operating room/postanesthesia care unit [40-42, 44, 51], emergency department [52,54], intensive care unit transport team [53], medical/surgical units [39,58], labour and delivery [48], and crisis/cardiac arrest [43,45,49,50,[55][56][57] The overall quantity of the nontechnical skills were different between the groups (p = 0.02).…”

Section: Settingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Three studies [41,44,45] included a prepost design and only reported the total number of participants in the study. Researchers reported on studies with physicians only [40,41,52], medical residents/students/interns only [39,42,49,50,54,56], nursing and medical students [43], nurses only [44,48], nursing students only [55], and a mix of care providers [45,47,51,53,57,58]. Only one study reported on a mix of care providers and patients [46].…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Systematic review of the characteristics of brief team interventions to clarify roles and improve functioning in healthcare teams

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim Describe brief (less than half a day) interventions aimed at improving healthcare team functioning. Methods A systematic review on brief team interventions aimed at role clarification and team functioning (PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42018088922). Experimental or quasi-experimental studies were included. Database searches included CINAHL, Medline, EMBASE, PUBMED, Cochrane, RCT Registry-1990 to April 2020 and grey literature. Articles were screened independently by teams of two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed. Data from the retained articles were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer independently. A narrative synthesis was undertaken. Results Searches yielded 1928 unique records. Final sample contained twenty papers describing 19 studies, published between 2009 and 2020. Studies described brief training interventions conducted in acute care in-patient settings and included a total of 6338 participants. Participants' socio-demographic information was not routinely reported. Studies met between two to six of the eight risk of bias criteria. Interventions included simulations for technical skills, structured communications and speaking up for non-technical skills and debriefing.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 88%

Section: Settingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Systematic review of the characteristics of brief team interventions to clarify roles and improve functioning in healthcare teams

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Non-technical skills and otolaryngology: systematic review

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the published literature on non-technical skills in otolaryngology surgery and examine the applicability of any research to others’ practice, and to explore how the published literature can identify areas for further development and guide future research.MethodsA systematic review was conducted using the following key words: ‘otolaryngology’, ‘otorhinolaryngology’, ‘ENT’, ‘ENT surgery’, ‘ear, nose and throat surgery’, ‘head and neck surgery’, ‘thyroid surgery’, ‘parathyroid surgery’, ‘otology’, ‘rhinology’, ‘laryngology’ ‘skull base surgery’, ‘airway surgery’, ‘non-technical skills’, ‘non technical skills for surgeons’, ‘NOTSS’, ‘behavioural markers’ and ‘behavioural assessment tool’.ResultsThree publications were included in the review – 1 randomised, controlled trial and 2 cohort studies – involving 78 participants. All were simulation-based studies involving training otolaryngology surgeons.ConclusionLittle research has been undertaken on non-technical skills in otolaryngology. Training surgeons’ non-technical skill levels are similar across every tested aspect. The research already performed can guide further studies, particularly amongst non-training otolaryngology surgeons and in both emergency and elective non-simulated environments.

show abstract

Educational and Patient Care Impacts of In Situ Simulation in Healthcare

Calhoun,

Cook,

Genova

et al. 2024

Sim Healthcare

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This systematic review was performed to assess the effectiveness of in situ simulation education. We searched databases including MEDLINE and Embase for studies comparing in situ simulation with other educational approaches. Two reviewers screened articles and extracted information. Sixty-two articles met inclusion criteria, of which 24 were synthesized quantitatively using random effects meta-analysis. When compared with current educational practices alone, the addition of in situ simulation to these practices was associated with small improvements in clinical outcomes, including mortality [odds ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.55 to 0.78], care metrics (standardized mean difference, −0.34; 95% CI, −0.45 to −0.21), and nontechnical skills (standardized mean difference, −0.52; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.05). Comparisons between in situ and traditional simulation showed mixed learner preference and knowledge improvement between groups, while technical skills showed improvement attributable to in situ simulation. In summary, available evidence suggests that adding in situ simulation to current educational practices may improve patient mortality and morbidity.

show abstract

An interprofessional training program for intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: model build-up and assessment

Cited by 10 publications

References 7 publications

Systematic review of the characteristics of brief team interventions to clarify roles and improve functioning in healthcare teams

Systematic review of the characteristics of brief team interventions to clarify roles and improve functioning in healthcare teams

Non-technical skills and otolaryngology: systematic review

Educational and Patient Care Impacts of In Situ Simulation in Healthcare

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About