An interpretive approach to evaluating information systems: A content, context, process framework

Stockdale, Rosemary; Standing, Craig

doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.07.006

Cited by 119 publications

(110 citation statements)

References 51 publications

(96 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

108

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…4). The contributions reflect learning from successes and mistakes of developing, instantiating and evaluating the ensemble artifact of performance indicators as content, change context description, and the assessment process including application of indicators and the use of the resulting measures [18]. …”

Section: Table 2 Design Principlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…processes, services, business units) can be described by performance indicators. Our empirical research is centered on an ensemble artifact of performance indicators (content), description of the eGovernment initiative (context), and their use in the assessment (process) of effects from eGovernment initiative [18]. eGovernment indicator s material and organizationa technology-based designs, innovation where performa policies and work practic 22].Following the principl ingrained research for the r theory in the artifact which efforts.…”

Section: A Theory-ingrained Artifactmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessing Effects of eGovernment Initiatives Based on a Public Value Framework

Hellang

Flak

2012

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Assessing effects of eGovernment initiatives is considered an important but challenging endeavor. Assessments are, among other things, important to justify e-government investments. They are challenging because they are complex, often based on locally defined indicators, many times overemphasizing financial effects, imprecise, faced with a number of contingencies and very seldom validated. Consequently, effect assessments can be seen as imprecise and difficult to compare across different initiatives. This paper addresses some of the challenges by attempting to assess effects based on a public value framework through an action design study with a Norwegian government agency. Based on our findings, we suggest 5 design principles for adapting and using performance indicators for assessing effects from eGovernment initiatives.

show abstract

Section: Table 2 Design Principlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: A Theory-ingrained Artifactmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Effects of eGovernment Initiatives Based on a Public Value Framework

Hellang

Flak

2012

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…and 'when'); and (3) Content ('what') (Stockdale & Standing, 2006). The effectiveness and performance evaluation of a design framework such as this should 218 be carried out also using semi-structured interviews of designers, including their formal evaluation, adhering to appropriate comparison criteria (Song & Sakao, 2017).…”

Section: Evaluation Phasementioning

confidence: 99%

A methodological framework for exploring the applicability of virtual reality in cognitive disabilities care

Betances¹,

Isabel²

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is always going to be a reason why you can't do something, your job is toconstantly look for the reasons why you can achieve your dreams. Shannon Miller -7x Olympic Gymnast medallist AcknowledgmentsI would like to firstly express my sincere gratitude to my advisor ProfessorMaría Teresa Arredondo Waldmeyer for her continuous support of my PhD studies and related research, and for her inspiration, tenacity, and immense knowledge.In addition to my advisor, I thank Prof. María Fernanda Cabrera-Umpiérrez and Prof. Francisco J. García-Sánchez, not only for their insightful commentaries and supportive encouragement, but also for the helpful suggestions and revision recommendations which motivated me to extend the scope of my research work to wider perspectives.I also thank my former colleagues and present fellow teammates at LifeSTech for the stimulating discussions, help and advice, as well as for the interesting times we shared working and learning together at several projects during the last years.Last but not least, I thank my family and friends for supporting all my life goals and purposes, and for the patience shown while I was writing this thesis.ix AbstractHandling the care needs of people affected by Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) represents nowadays a personal, familial and social challenge of enormous proportions, which poses an ever growing human and economic burden on the world's society in general. Information and communication technologies (ICT) have the potential to make a considerable impact to help revert this trend, especially through the use of advanced virtual reality (VR)-based computerized diagnostic and therapeutic cognitive interventions for people living with, or at risk of developing,ADRD. This doctoral thesis aims to facilitate the use of such VR-based interventions.To that end, it makes specific original contributions regarding: the categorization of VR systems particularly designed for ADRD; an analysis and assessment of the current relevance and impact of the 'brain training debate' involving commercial brain training products; an up-to-date critical description of the technical and scientific challenges faced today for the development of effective VR-based cognitive training tools; and finally, this thesis proposes a novel methodological design framework to provide guidance to researchers and developers with the design process of VR-based tools to address the care needs of people with ADRD. The framework is based on our previous critical analysis of the most recent knowledge available about VR cognitive interventions. The framework and its ensuing roadmap take into account, not only universal design principles, standard techniques and methodologies, but also addresses the specific aspects of accessibility and usability that are particular to the use VR-based platforms on patients with ADRD-associated cognitive impairments.x xi ResumenEl manejo de las necesidades de atención de las personas afectadas por la enfermedad de Alzheimer y demencias relacionadas (EADR)...

show abstract

“…Second, a framework to investigate equivocal situations in practice is formed by linking literature from IS/IT evaluation and IS/IT project continuation decisions. Third, the causes of equivocality when evaluating and deciding the continuation of on-going IS/IT projects are investigated using extensive interviews with experts based on the framework drawn from Stockdale and Standing (2006), an extension of the content, context, and process (CCP) framework and of Goldkuhl and Lagsten's (2012) conceptual practice model of evaluation (CPME). Insights on equivocal situations are gleaned from the perspectives of different decision-makers or stakeholders.…”

Section: Why Do Equivocal Situations Occur When Evaluating and Decidimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These frameworks suggest evaluation is a practice and a process to acquire additional knowledge related to an object that consists of several interconnected elements, for instance the evaluation criteria and evaluation procedure, within the context, content and process (Goldkuhl and Lagsten 2012). The broad view of these frameworks provides useful insights into the constituents of evaluation and the guidelines to establish key issues during evaluation (Stockdale and Standing 2006). We draw on these two and derive a new framework that pulls together the characteristics of equivocal situations, evaluation frames and their corresponding causes of equivocality, as depicted in Figure 6.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Unraveling equivocality in evaluation of information systems projects

Arviansyah¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An interpretive approach to evaluating information systems: A content, context, process framework

Cited by 119 publications

References 51 publications

Assessing Effects of eGovernment Initiatives Based on a Public Value Framework

Assessing Effects of eGovernment Initiatives Based on a Public Value Framework

A methodological framework for exploring the applicability of virtual reality in cognitive disabilities care

Unraveling equivocality in evaluation of information systems projects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About