1990
DOI: 10.1070/sm1990v066n02abeh001178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Interpretation of the Beurling-Malliavin Theorem on the Radius of Completeness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There exist at least five definitions of the upper Beurling-Malliavin density (see paper [4] which is devoted to equivalence of different definitions). We start with the most wellknown: Definition 1.…”
Section: Proof Of Proposition 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist at least five definitions of the upper Beurling-Malliavin density (see paper [4] which is devoted to equivalence of different definitions). We start with the most wellknown: Definition 1.…”
Section: Proof Of Proposition 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later the same quantity b(Λ) was studied by other authors, for instance [8], [9], and used in several papers; we cite [7], [10] and [15]; for an extensive study and generalizations see [13], [12], [1] (see [14] for a complete list of references); in particular the author of [15] discovers an alternative equivalent definition, which will be stated and used later (see Definition 2.1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The asymptotic estimate of quantity ( ) for the sum of entire Dirichlet series (1) in terms of maximum | | on the vertical segment = { = + : | − | } of a certain length was obtained in [1]. At that, the length | | of segment should not be less than a certain characteristics close to similar characteristics allowing one to determine the completeness radius for the system of exponents {︀ }︀ in space [ , ] (or 2 [ , ]) (on this subject see [1,4,5,6]). It is natural to expect that while estimating ( ) by the minimum of modulus, in a general situation the length of segment can not be too large.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%