7th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (CIT 2007) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/cit.2007.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Internet Voting Protocol with Receipt-Free and Coercion-Resistant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expanded properties: universal verifiability, receiptfreeness [12,13], coercion-resistance [14] A lot of protocols use ad hoc physical assumption or the trusted third party to accomplish receipt-freeness. Papers [14,15,16,17] are better in the implementation of the expanded properties. They do not use strong physical assumption.…”
Section: The Coercion-resistant Internet Voting Model Without Physicamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Expanded properties: universal verifiability, receiptfreeness [12,13], coercion-resistance [14] A lot of protocols use ad hoc physical assumption or the trusted third party to accomplish receipt-freeness. Papers [14,15,16,17] are better in the implementation of the expanded properties. They do not use strong physical assumption.…”
Section: The Coercion-resistant Internet Voting Model Without Physicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, to our best knowledge, we originally give an internet voting model with coercion-resistance without physical assumptions based on our proposed deniable encryption scheme. We also compare the typical internet voting protocols [14,15,16,17] with our proposed model. The result can be found in TABLE II.…”
Section: The Proposed Internet Voting Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…His protocol has receiptfreeness and coercion-resistance and it with weak physical assumptions: a one way anonymous channel between voter and authority. Meng [27] also proposes an Internet voting protocol applied designated verifier proof and proof of knowledge of two ciphertexts of the same plaintext based the same idea. The protocol also supposes there is a one way anonymous channel between voter and authority.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Receipt-freeness, first introduced in [27] and [30], is considered a very important property for remote Evoting systems and many research works have been dedicated to it [7] [23] [42] [43]. It means that voters are not able to provide any proof of their voting strategies to others.…”
Section: Receipt-freenessmentioning
confidence: 99%