2014
DOI: 10.2147/amep.s68241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An international validation study of two achievement goal measures in a pharmacy education context

Abstract: BackgroundAchievement goal theory helps us understand what motivates students to participate in educational activities. However, measuring achievement goals in a precise manner is problematic. Elliot and McGregor’s Achievement Goal Questionnaire (AGQ) and Elliot and Murayama’s revised Achievement Goal Questionnaire (AGQ-R) are widely used to assess students’ achievement goals. Both instruments were developed and validated using undergraduate psychology students in the USA.MethodsIn this study, our aims were to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the 2 × 2 framework). These instruments have been used widely in non‐health professions fields and occasionally in medical and pharmacy education . Modest validity evidence for AGQ‐R scores has accumulated in non‐health professions education.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the 2 × 2 framework). These instruments have been used widely in non‐health professions fields and occasionally in medical and pharmacy education . Modest validity evidence for AGQ‐R scores has accumulated in non‐health professions education.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,11 Elliot and McGregor's achievement goal questionnaire (AGQ) and Elliot and Murayama's revised version (AGQ-R) are widely used to assess students' achievement goals. 8,12 Both instruments were developed and validated on US undergraduate psychology students, although Alrakaf et al's study on pharmacy students in Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States argued that the AGQ is a more psychometrically robust measure than the AGQ-R. 13 The "Attitude Toward Learning and Performance in College This Semester" (ATL) questionnaire was introduced by Pieper in 2003. 10 It incorporated questions adapted from the AGQ with 4 additional items previously used by Harackiewicz et al, which measure the additional work-avoidance parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To answer all of these questions precisely, we used a budget methodology specifically designed to differentiate between essential and nonessential teacher qualities 33 and a validated measure of achievement motivation. 35 That the enthusiasm quality emerged as one of the most preferred teacher qualities was not a surprise to us. A qualitative study conducted by Alrakaf and colleagues to investigate undergraduate pharmacy students' preferences for teaching indicated, without prompting, that students highly value this quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to these measures, gender and age were included as socio-demographic indicators in the survey. The AGQ is a validated and psychometrically robust instrument 35 intended to measure the 4 types of student achievement goals and contained 12 items. Students rated each item on a 1 to 7 scale (15not at all true of me, 75very true of me).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%