2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2000.tb00346.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An international perspective on Tourette syndrome: selected findings from 3500 individuals in 22 countries

Abstract: We have established a multisite, international database of 3500 individuals diagnosed with Tourette syndrome (TS). The male:female ratio is 4.3:1 for the total sample, with wide variation among sites; the male excess occurs at every site. Anger control problems, sleep difficulties, coprolalia, and self‐injurious behavior only reach impressive levels in individuals with comorbidity. Anger control problems are strongly correlated with comorbidity, regardless of site, region, or whether assessed by neurologists o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

32
296
8
32

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(368 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
32
296
8
32
Order By: Relevance
“…Scores on all negative scales (i.e., adverse family impact) were significantly higher in the CTD-Plus group, suggesting greater impairment in family functioning for families with youth who have both CTD and a comorbid condition. Compared to previous research, scores on the negative impact scale in the overall sample were similar to those reported for young adults (ages [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] with cerebral palsy (mean = 21.3, SD = 12.1) and higher than those with Down Syndrome (mean = 16.5, SD = 8.0). Scores on the negative impact scale in the CTD-Plus group were similar to scores reported for intellectual disability (mean = 24.5, SD = 11.2) but lower than for autism (mean = 28.9, SD = 9.0) [42].…”
Section: Family Functioningsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scores on all negative scales (i.e., adverse family impact) were significantly higher in the CTD-Plus group, suggesting greater impairment in family functioning for families with youth who have both CTD and a comorbid condition. Compared to previous research, scores on the negative impact scale in the overall sample were similar to those reported for young adults (ages [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] with cerebral palsy (mean = 21.3, SD = 12.1) and higher than those with Down Syndrome (mean = 16.5, SD = 8.0). Scores on the negative impact scale in the CTD-Plus group were similar to scores reported for intellectual disability (mean = 24.5, SD = 11.2) but lower than for autism (mean = 28.9, SD = 9.0) [42].…”
Section: Family Functioningsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Additional limitations to existing research include poor generalizability due to small treatment-seeking samples, which may exclude youth with mild tics, those who experience financial or geographic barriers to diagnosis and treatment, and those who choose not to seek clinical care (e.g., parents do not want to draw attention to condition, do not recognize symptoms or misattribute them to other causes, are opposed to medication or medical intervention, or prioritize treating other conditions due to psychosocial and/or cultural factors). In addition, TS studies using large samples tend to combine adult and youth data [e.g., 23,26,27], making it difficult to disentangle functional impairment in youth alone. An enhanced understanding of the impact of TS on youth would improve existing treatment and assessment efforts and help prioritize future developments in these clinical areas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of GTS was always accompanied with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and learning disorder [3]. In addition, the tics of GTS can also cause several problems in cognitive functions, including dysfunction in fronto-striatal pathways, and impairment in attention, memory and information processing [3], which would affect the growth and learning of children and adolescents [4][5][6]. However, there was still no effective prevention and treatment for the poor cognitive functions of GTS patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because diagnostic standards and epidemiological survey methods (such as respondent, method, age-range and area) varied among different countries, the reported epidemiological survey results differ greatly [1]. Till date, epidemiological survey material on TS in the population is scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%