2010
DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/30/2/s06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An international model validation exercise on radionuclide transfer and doses to freshwater biota

Abstract: Under the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)'s EMRAS (Environmental Modelling for Radiation Safety) programme, activity concentrations of (60)Co, (90)Sr, (137)Cs and (3)H in Perch Lake at Atomic Energy of Canada Limited's Chalk River Laboratories site were predicted, in freshwater primary producers, invertebrates, fishes, herpetofauna and mammals using eleven modelling approaches. Comparison of predicted radionuclide concentrations in the different species types with measured values highlighted a number… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Smith et al (2000) demonstrate approximately two-orders of magnitude variation in CR wo-water explained by water K concentration) with water pH and Ca concentration also being suggested to influence Cs transfer (Smith et al, 2002). Consequently, there is often large variation between the outputs of models using CR wo values to predict activity concentrations in wildlife (Beresford et al, 2008c;Yankovich et al, 2010;Johansen et al, 2012) and the approach is open to criticism as being too simplistic (ICRP 2009). However, pragmatically the CR wo approach is easy to apply and has the most comprehensive datasets available, and hence it continues to be recommended in international compilations (Howard et al, 2013;ICRP, 2009).…”
Section: Effect Of Other Variables On Cr Wo-watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smith et al (2000) demonstrate approximately two-orders of magnitude variation in CR wo-water explained by water K concentration) with water pH and Ca concentration also being suggested to influence Cs transfer (Smith et al, 2002). Consequently, there is often large variation between the outputs of models using CR wo values to predict activity concentrations in wildlife (Beresford et al, 2008c;Yankovich et al, 2010;Johansen et al, 2012) and the approach is open to criticism as being too simplistic (ICRP 2009). However, pragmatically the CR wo approach is easy to apply and has the most comprehensive datasets available, and hence it continues to be recommended in international compilations (Howard et al, 2013;ICRP, 2009).…”
Section: Effect Of Other Variables On Cr Wo-watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wood et al, 2009a;Beresford et al, 2010;Yankovich et al, 2010b;Johansen et al, 2012). Beresford and Wood (2014) evaluated to what extent the Beresford and Vives i Batlle (2013) model could be applied to reptiles.…”
Section: Application To Reptilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LIETDOS-BIO model and computer code for biota exposure dose rate calculation was validated during IAEA EMRAS (Environmental Modeling for Radiation Safety) Working Group designated for model validation for biota dose assessment (Vives-i-Batlle et al, 2007;Beresford et al, 2008a;Beresford et al, 2008b;Beresford et al, 2009;Yankovich et al, 2010 …”
Section: Site-specific Lietdos-bio Computer Code Designed For Non-hummentioning
confidence: 99%