An International, Cross-Sectional Survey of Preprinting Attitudes Among Biomedical Researchers

Abstract

Background: Preprints are scientific manuscripts that are made available on open-access servers but are not yet peer reviewed. While preprints are becoming more prevalent uptake is not uniform or optimal. Understanding researchers' opinions and attitudes towards preprints is valuable to their successful implementation. Understanding knowledge gaps and researchers' attitudes toward preprinting can assist stakeholders like journals, funding agencies, and universities to implement preprints more effectively. Here, we aim to collect perceptions and behaviours regarding preprints in across an international sample of biomedical researchers. Methods: Biomedical authors were identified by a keyword-based, systematic search from the MEDLINE database, and their emails were extracted to invite them to our survey. A cross-sectional anonymous survey was distributed to all identified biomedical authors to collect their knowledge, attitudes, and opinions about preprinting. Results: The survey was completed by 730 biomedical researchers with a response rate of 3.20% and demonstrated a wide range of attitudes and opinions about preprints with authors from various disciplines and career stages around the world. Most respondents were familiar with the concept of preprints, but most had not published a preprint before. The lead author of the project and journal policy had the most impact on decisions to post a preprint, while employers/research institute had the least impact. Supporting open science practices was the highest ranked incentive, while increases to authors' visibility was highest ranked motivation for publishing preprints. Conclusion: While many biomedical researchers recognize the benefits of preprints, there is still hesitation among others to engage in this practice. This may be due to the general lack of peer review of preprints and little enthusiasm from external organizations, such as journals, funding agencies, and universities. Future work is needed to determine optimal ways to increase researcher's attitudes through modifications to current preprint systems and policies.

To preprint or not to preprint: A global researcher survey

“…However, there are also challenges that may slow down the adoption of preprinting. Common concerns about preprinting include scooping risks, low reliability and credibility, premature media coverage, geographical disparities in adoption and incompatibility with journal policies (Blatch-Jones et al, 2023;Fraser et al, 2022;Ng et al, 2023;Puebla et al, 2021;Sever et al, 2019;Smart, 2022). Journal policies for posting and citing preprints vary across disciplines.…”

To Preprint or Not to Preprint: A Global Researcher Survey

“…However, there are also challenges that may slow down the adoption of preprinting. Common concerns about preprinting include scooping risks, low reliability and credibility, premature media coverage, geographical disparities in adoption and incompatibility with journal policies (Blatch-Jones et al, 2023;Fraser et al, 2022;Ng et al, 2023;Puebla et al, 2021;Sever et al, 2019;Smart, 2022). Journal policies for posting and citing preprints vary across disciplines.…”