2006
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An interior‐point algorithm for elastoplasticity

Abstract: SUMMARYThe problem of small-deformation, rate-independent elastoplasticity is treated using convex programming theory and algorithms. A finite-step variational formulation is first derived after which the relevant potential is discretized in space and subsequently viewed as the Lagrangian associated with a convex mathematical program. Next, an algorithm, based on the classical primal-dual interior point method, is developed. Several key modifications to the conventional implementation of this algorithm are mad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
133
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
133
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For associated materials, it is possible to define a (global) minimization problem for which (2.11) are just the optimality conditions. Then, powerful methods from optimization are available, e.g., SQP methods (Wieners, 2007(Wieners, , 2008, interior point methods (Krabbenhoft, Lyamin, Sloan, and Wriggers, 2006), and augmented Lagrange methods (Sauter, 2010). For these methods, global convergence can be guaranteed.…”
Section: Discretization By the Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For associated materials, it is possible to define a (global) minimization problem for which (2.11) are just the optimality conditions. Then, powerful methods from optimization are available, e.g., SQP methods (Wieners, 2007(Wieners, , 2008, interior point methods (Krabbenhoft, Lyamin, Sloan, and Wriggers, 2006), and augmented Lagrange methods (Sauter, 2010). For these methods, global convergence can be guaranteed.…”
Section: Discretization By the Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A specific feature of the Drucker-Prager model is the non-differentiability of the yield function at the boundary of the elastic domain. This is often seen as a drawback and we also consider a smoothed variant (Krabbenhoft et al, 2006;Miehe and Lambrecht, 1999), which renders the yield function smooth at the expense that it is no longer possible to write down the response function explicitly.…”
Section: Drucker-prager Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was the basis of the mathematical programming approach to elasticplastic structural analysis pioneered by Maier and and coworkers (see, for example, [7,8]). More recently, Krabbenhoft et al [9] have developed an interior point algorithm for the incremental update of the structural state in elastic-plastic models. Variational update at the element level has been applied, for example, by Comi [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, most 54 H. W. CHANDLER AND C. M. SANDS computational models have been developed by either ignoring the excessive dilation (e.g. [2]) or by specifying the yield surface and flow rule independently (e.g. [3]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%