1993
DOI: 10.3133/ofr92123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An interim report on flows in the lower Roanoke River, and water quality and hydrodynamics of Albermarle Sound, North Carolina, October 1989-April 1991

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(2 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average depth is 4.6 m and bottom sediments are composed of silt, clay and sand. The Roanoke River supplies more than half the total freshwater input to Albemarle Sound (Bales et al, 1993). Prior to the construction of a series of large hydropower dams, the section of the Roanoke River between river kilometer (rkm) 206 and 242 was considered by Carnes (1965) to be the fall zone, the high-gradient transition between the Piedmont and Coastal Plain provinces ( Fig.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average depth is 4.6 m and bottom sediments are composed of silt, clay and sand. The Roanoke River supplies more than half the total freshwater input to Albemarle Sound (Bales et al, 1993). Prior to the construction of a series of large hydropower dams, the section of the Roanoke River between river kilometer (rkm) 206 and 242 was considered by Carnes (1965) to be the fall zone, the high-gradient transition between the Piedmont and Coastal Plain provinces ( Fig.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Background. Habitat quality could be a limiting factor for juvenile Atlantic sturgeon within Albemarle Sound because of the lack of deepwater thermal refugia during periods of peak (30°C) water temperature (Bales et al, 1993;Haeseker et al, 1996). However, an advantage of the shallow water is that the sound is generally well mixed in late summer and tends to be normoxic (Haeseker et al, 1996).…”
Section: Juvenile Bycatchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…InVEST requires an economic valuation input table to calculate the avoided cost of nitrogen removal. 2 We calculated the value of N retained using three approximations of value: benefits transfer from Jenkins et al (2010); average and median marginal Bales et al, 1993;Hartigan et al 1983;USEPA, 1983;Line et al 2002;Loehr 1974;Barren Land 12.4;0 Dodd et al 19920.5-12.4 Dodd et al, 1992Loehr 1974;Forest 11.4;0.6 Line et al 2002;Breemen et al 20021.6-11.4 Dodd et al 1992Beaulac and Reckhow, 1982;Line et al 2002;Rast and Lee 1978;Loehr et al 1989 abatement costs of the 18 POTWs (Kessler, 2010); spatially allocated marginal abatement costs by tributary (Kessler, 2010). We included the benefits transfer because it represents an actual range of the cost of marginal trade for nitrogen reduction credits that could potentially be devised for our study region.…”
Section: Economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%