2010
DOI: 10.1190/1.3486453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An interferometric theory of source-receiver scattering and imaging

Abstract: It is known that there is a link between the theory of seismic interferometry and theories of seismic imaging and inversion. However, although this has been discussed in several studies, there are few where any explicit links have been derived. We use reciprocity theorems for scattering media to derive a new form of seismic interferometry that describes the scattered wavefield between a source and a receiver in an acoustic medium, using both sources and receivers on two enclosing boundaries. This form of seism… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Rðx S ; x R ; tÞ is the measured reflection response with ghosts and surface-related multiples removed and with the source wavelet deconvolved, Ã denotes temporal convolution, ∂D S represents the seismic acquisition surface datum, and the exact expression for which equation 2 is an approximation is given by Halliday and Curtis (2010) for acoustic media and Ravasi and Curtis (2013) for elastic media. The removal of free-surface multiples from R may be unnecessary if the method of Singh et al (2015) is used, although that is not attempted here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Rðx S ; x R ; tÞ is the measured reflection response with ghosts and surface-related multiples removed and with the source wavelet deconvolved, Ã denotes temporal convolution, ∂D S represents the seismic acquisition surface datum, and the exact expression for which equation 2 is an approximation is given by Halliday and Curtis (2010) for acoustic media and Ravasi and Curtis (2013) for elastic media. The removal of free-surface multiples from R may be unnecessary if the method of Singh et al (2015) is used, although that is not attempted here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, an explicit link has been established between seismic interferometry and reverse-time imaging in acoustic media (Curtis, 2009;Curtis and Halliday, 2010;Halliday and Curtis, 2010). This has allowed the wavefield-extrapolation step and various imaging conditions to be reinterpreted in terms of physical wavepropagation phenomena, and to be reformulated in a nonlinear fashion using representation theorems (Vasconcelos et al, 2009aHalliday and Curtis, 2010;Sava and Vasconcelos, 2011;Vasconcelos, 2011;Fleury and Vasconcelos, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has allowed the wavefield-extrapolation step and various imaging conditions to be reinterpreted in terms of physical wavepropagation phenomena, and to be reformulated in a nonlinear fashion using representation theorems (Vasconcelos et al, 2009aHalliday and Curtis, 2010;Sava and Vasconcelos, 2011;Vasconcelos, 2011;Fleury and Vasconcelos, 2012). In this paper, we focus our attention on elastic migration by wavefield extrapolation (for example, by elastic RTM), and we use a correlationtype representation theorem in elastic media to identify a new set of true-amplitude, nonlinear ICs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because Marchenko imaging involves redatuming of sources as well as receivers, it has an interesting relation with source-receiver interferometry, as proposed by Curtis and Halliday (2010) and Halliday and Curtis (2010). We analyze this relation for the Marchenko scheme for imaging from below.…”
Section: Comparison With Source-receiver Interferometrymentioning
confidence: 99%