2020
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2020.3017808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Interferometric Phase Noise Reduction Method Based on Modified Denoising Convolutional Neural Network

Abstract: Traditional interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) denoising methods normally try to estimate the phase fringes directly from the noisy interferogram. Since the statistics of phase noise are more stable than the phase corresponding to complex terrain, it could be easier to estimate the phase noise. In this paper, phase noises rather than phase fringes are estimated first, and then they are subtracted from the noisy interferometric phase for denoising. The denoising convolutional neural network (DnCNN… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first step, we evaluate a single value of noise standard deviation using both spatial as well as transform domain information of image assuming that the noise follows Gaussian distribution across the image. This step can also be independently used for Aja-Fern andez et al (Rician) 16 Liu et al 17 Li et al 7 Maximov et al 32 estimation of spatially invariant noise. In the second step, the noise correction factor is evaluated using the relationship between Gaussian and RN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the first step, we evaluate a single value of noise standard deviation using both spatial as well as transform domain information of image assuming that the noise follows Gaussian distribution across the image. This step can also be independently used for Aja-Fern andez et al (Rician) 16 Liu et al 17 Li et al 7 Maximov et al 32 estimation of spatially invariant noise. In the second step, the noise correction factor is evaluated using the relationship between Gaussian and RN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatially invariant Rician noise (RN) was widely accepted in literature as an appropriate model of noise in MRI. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The main assumption was a single coil MR acquisition; hence, in all the cases, the noise in the MRI is considered to be spatially homogeneous and hence a single value of noise standard deviation was sufficient to characterize the entire dataset. In the present MRI acquisition scenario, such presumptions certainly fail due to the complexity of fast imaging with multicoil for parallel imaging and reconstruction and local field inhomogeneities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantitatively compare the filtering results of different methods, phase root mean square error (RMSE), edge-preserving index (EPI), the number of residual points and filtering time, are introduced to evaluate the filtered phases. Their definition can be found in [32].…”
Section: A Simulated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the performance of the filtering results is evaluated with the number of residual points, residual phase deviation (RPSD) and filtering time. The RPSD is calculated after removing the local fringes, whose definition and calculation formula can be found in [32].…”
Section: B Real Data 1) Ers Sar Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2018 proposed an InSAR‐BM3D filtering method based on block matching and 3D filtering (BM3D) algorithm, which used the decorrelating transform to separate the real and imaginary parts and look for similar structures instead of looking for similar blocks directly to the original phase. With the development of signal processing methods, sparse signal processing methods (Çetin et al., 2014; Potter et al., 2010) and filtering methods based on deep learning (Zhang et al., 2016; Zhu et al., 2017) and convolutional neural networkhave (CNN) also been proposed (Li et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%