An Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach Combining Orthodontic Forced Eruption with Immediate Implant Placement to Achieve a Satisfactory Treatment Outcome: A Case Report

Abstract

In the face of difficult clinical challenges, meticulous inspection and a comprehensive treatment plan were crucial. Interdisciplinary treatment through the careful integration of multiple specialists suggests the possibility of optimal results with high predictability.

A comparative study of combined periodontal and orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and clear aligners in patients with periodontitis

“…The correction of these malpositioned teeth permits better access for oral hygiene and can improve the morphology of marginal soft and hard tissues. Combined periodontal and orthodontic treatment has been shown to improve periodontal health and to re-establish well-functioning dentition [ 3 4 ]. After proper periodontal therapy, orthodontic treatment can improve both the alveolar bone and soft periodontal tissues [ 5 ].…”

Predictability of a New Orthodontic Extrusion Technique for Implant Site Development: A Retrospective Consecutive Case-Series Study

“…In cases of circumferential bone loss, as well as in cases of severe gingival recession, the orthodontic extrusion cannot ensure a vertical bone development suitable for the ideal implant placement, with complications such as bone dehiscence. From the various studies analysed [17,20,21,23,24], we can conclude that, even if the validity of the orthodontic extrusion technique has been demonstrated, there are no common guidelines that can be followed by the clinicians. On the contrary, there is agreement for the use of mild and continuous forces as well as for the importance of the stabilization period and of the overcorrection.…”

“…mm extrusion/month OC FB FU X-ray 0-1mm 1-2mm >2 mm H. Salama and M. Salama [10] 3m X-ray Linear 2-D Korayem et al [16] 7 m-3 y Linear 2-D Brindis and Block [6] Uribe et al [17] Kim et al [18] 5y X-ray Linear 2-D Amato et al [19] 18-61 m Linear 2-D Rokn et al [20] 4 m X-ray Linear 2-D Linear 2-D Chou et al [21] 2y X-ray Watanabe et al [22] 4y CBCT Volume 3-D Hochman et al [5] 1y CBCT Linear 3-D Keceli et al [23] 12 m Linear 2-D Alsahhaf and Att [24] Kwon et al [25] Linear 2-D 6 e Scientific World Journal Table 4: Data from the literature review in which the parameter of the stabilization times was compared (grey filled box � yes applied).…”

Reconstruction of the Alveolar Buccal Bone Plate in Compromised Fresh Socket after Immediate Implant Placement Followed by Immediate Provisionalization

“…Post‐extraction alveolar ridge remodeling can result in 3.8 mm (width) and 1.24 mm (height) of bone loss in the first 6 months and continues at a rate of 0.25–0.5% per year . Furthermore, collapse of the alveolar process and soft tissue alterations after tooth extraction result in the absence of interproximal papillae that compromises subsequent prosthetic restoration . Nevertheless, it has been stated that IIP alone cannot prevent alveolar bone resorption after tooth extraction .…”

“…7 Furthermore, collapse of the alveolar process and soft tissue alterations after tooth extraction result in the absence of interproximal papillae that compromises subsequent prosthetic restoration. 8 Nevertheless, it has been stated that IIP alone cannot prevent alveolar bone resorption after tooth extraction. [9][10][11][12][13] Importantly, in these studies, flap reflection and absence of bone and connective graft materials may have affected the treatment outcome.…”