2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr.2018.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An intercomparison of the taxonomic and size composition of tropical macrozooplankton and micronekton collected using three sampling gears

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if our abundance estimates were to be converted to a more useful currency in food web models (e.g., biomass or carbon content per individual), then the shifts observed in 2015 and 2016 are likely to be even more dramatic. Many of the crustaceans normally caught in this survey (e.g., euphausiids, sergestid shrimp) are at the smaller (15-25 mm) end of the micronekton size spectrum (Kwong et al, 2018). For example, the average weight of an adult E. pacifica is 0.10 g and the average weight of an adult T. spinifera is 0.12 g (based on collections in both warm and cold years, Elizabeth Daly, Oregon State University, unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if our abundance estimates were to be converted to a more useful currency in food web models (e.g., biomass or carbon content per individual), then the shifts observed in 2015 and 2016 are likely to be even more dramatic. Many of the crustaceans normally caught in this survey (e.g., euphausiids, sergestid shrimp) are at the smaller (15-25 mm) end of the micronekton size spectrum (Kwong et al, 2018). For example, the average weight of an adult E. pacifica is 0.10 g and the average weight of an adult T. spinifera is 0.12 g (based on collections in both warm and cold years, Elizabeth Daly, Oregon State University, unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Echo-integrations of acoustic data were performed on 1-m layers at a threshold of -80 dB to exclude scatterers not representative of the micronekton community (Béhagle et al, 2017 expressed as abundance within the backscattering layer (ind. m -2 ) (as in Kwong et al, 2018).…”
Section: Acoustic Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for the observed variability in mean backscatter at MAD-Ridge summit compared to the immediate vicinity and the reasons for the observed decrease in trawl abundance/biomass estimates at the summit are further discussed with respect to the sampling strategy and IYGPT net used. Although trawl surveys are necessary to determine the taxonomic composition of micronekton present in the water column in space and time, the composition and biomass obtained largely depend on the type of trawl used (Kwong et al, 2018), their catchability towards various taxonomic groups of nekton and the depth range sampled. Trawl sampling is difficult on shallow topographies because of the high risk of damaging the sampling gear…”
Section: Micronekton Scattering Layers and Assemblages At La Pérouse mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue is accentuated when the sampling aims to collect biological information from one of the DSLs commonly observed in open ocean ecosystems, which are distributed vertically at different depth ranges. To overcome this limitation, we need to move away from traditional single cod end trawl nets to use trawls with opening-closing mouths or cod ends, or in-trawl stereo cameras, or combine different types or trawls, or use acoustic and optic sampling (AOS) devices mounted on trawls and combine their information (Pearcy, 1983;Rosen and Christian, 2013;Kwong et al, 2018). Sampling of micronekton is still a topic that requires further research and development, as all sampling methods have their particular biases (often referred to as catchability).…”
Section: Mark Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%