2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4073(99)00211-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An intercomparison of laboratory measurements of absorption cross-sections and integrated absorption intensities for HCFC-22

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the experimental work, evidence was found for chlorodifluoromethane adsorption in the vacuum line and on the cell walls, resulting in its partial pressure during each measurement differing from the initial, measured value, although there was no evidence for this partial pressure changing over the course of a scan. This confirms previous observations made during the Spectroscopy and Warming potentials of Atmospheric Greenhouse Gases (SWAGG) project, which focused only on spectroscopic measurements for radiative forcing and global warming potentials rather than for remote sensing (Ballard et al, 2000). Due to this adsorption, the initial cross sections derived from Eq.…”
Section: Determination Of Absorption Cross Sections For Chlorodifluorsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…During the experimental work, evidence was found for chlorodifluoromethane adsorption in the vacuum line and on the cell walls, resulting in its partial pressure during each measurement differing from the initial, measured value, although there was no evidence for this partial pressure changing over the course of a scan. This confirms previous observations made during the Spectroscopy and Warming potentials of Atmospheric Greenhouse Gases (SWAGG) project, which focused only on spectroscopic measurements for radiative forcing and global warming potentials rather than for remote sensing (Ballard et al, 2000). Due to this adsorption, the initial cross sections derived from Eq.…”
Section: Determination Of Absorption Cross Sections For Chlorodifluorsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The dominant contribution to systematic errors was found to come from offsets in the 0% transmittance level and nonlinearities in the response of the HgCdTe detector. Investigation of these sources of systematic error (23) showed that, in the present experimental conditions, the corresponding uncertainty on the measured line intensities is smaller than 1%. We thus estimate that the accuracy of the line intensities measured is better than 2% at all JЉ values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…[19] and [20] using the values of the parameters involved given in Eqs. [21] and [23] Table 1) and the error bars the corresponding uncertainty (3). The dotted line shows the J-dependence predicted by ᐉ-type resonance alone as described in the section "ᐉ-type resonance" (see text), while the solid line represents the Herman-Wallis behavior predicted by ᐉ-type resonance and Coriolis coupling, calculated using Eqs.…”
Section: ؊1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the macroscopic radiation and atmospheric models, employed to understand the atmospheric chemistry as well as to model the Earth's atmosphere and its evolution, need as an input a detailed dataset. [8][9][10] Within this framework, infrared (IR) spectroscopy plays a primary role, [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] as it can provide accurate values of the relevant spectroscopic data, such as band positions and absorption cross sections. With these premises, it is not surprising that the last years have seen a renewed interest in the spectroscopic studies of halogenated organic compounds, motivated not only by their role as air pollutants, but also because these investigations are useful to improve the modeling of the atmospheric chemistry of these compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%