2015 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/bigdata.2015.7363841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An interactive learning framework for scalable classification of pathology images

Abstract: Recent advances in microscopy imaging and genomics have created an explosion of patient data in the pathology domain. Whole-slide images (WSIs) of tissues can now capture disease processes as they unfold in high resolution, recording the visual cues that have been the basis of pathologic diagnosis for over a century. Each WSI contains billions of pixels and up to a million or more microanatomic objects whose appearances hold important prognostic information. Computational image analysis enables the mining of m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Tuia et al [7] surveyed AL algorithms for RS image classification. Nalisink et al employed AL to reduce the labeling effort for image classification [8]. A good example using AL to overcome label quality problems by combining experts and crowd-sourced annotators can be found in [40].…”
Section: What's Al and Why Al?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tuia et al [7] surveyed AL algorithms for RS image classification. Nalisink et al employed AL to reduce the labeling effort for image classification [8]. A good example using AL to overcome label quality problems by combining experts and crowd-sourced annotators can be found in [40].…”
Section: What's Al and Why Al?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary focus of research in M&DL has thus far been accurate results, often at the expense of human understanding of how the results were achieved [2][3][4][5][6]. However, accurate results often depend on building large human-generated training data sets that can be expensive in both financial and person cost to create [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. As a result, there remain several impediments to broader adoption of M&DL, along with a range of concerns about potential negative outcomes related to the explainability of results produced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven contributions in the cluster have the user select a subset to be labeled, use all data, or employ a hybrid approach. Hybrid approaches [25], combine user-and system-selected sampling. In particular, the user may provide self-chosen examples to augment the system-selected ones or be given the opportunity to correct both suggested labels by the system and introduce new labels or examples for existing labels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the user may provide self-chosen examples to augment the system-selected ones or be given the opportunity to correct both suggested labels by the system and introduce new labels or examples for existing labels. For example, [25] work within the medical context to detect objects within microscopy images from pathological tissue samples. With their visualization approach, the authors enable the user to pick samples to label from a selection initially provided by the system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously developed a basic software prototype to establish the feasibility of active learning classification with whole-slide imaging datasets 25 . This prototype developed important technology for visualizing whole-slide images and image analysis metadata via the web, but lacked critical features needed for dissemination as a tool and was not extensively validated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%