2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-33-4909-4_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Interactive Framework to Compare Multi-criteria Optimization Algorithms: Preliminary Results on NSGA-II and MOPSO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the running time is [2.924EÀ03s, 2.509EÀ02s] for solving ZDT benchmark functions and the running time is [2.765EÀ02s, 9.062EÀ02s] for solving DTLZ benchmark. In order to prove the superiority of the ICDMOPSO algorithm, NSGA-III (Miriam et al, 2021), MOEA/D (Li et al, 2019b), cdMOPSO (Raquel and Naval, 2005), MOMPSO (Dorado-Sevilla et al, 2021) and MODE/DMSM (Deb and Jain, 2014) are selected for comparative analysis. The parameter settings of three algorithms are consistent with the original literature.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the running time is [2.924EÀ03s, 2.509EÀ02s] for solving ZDT benchmark functions and the running time is [2.765EÀ02s, 9.062EÀ02s] for solving DTLZ benchmark. In order to prove the superiority of the ICDMOPSO algorithm, NSGA-III (Miriam et al, 2021), MOEA/D (Li et al, 2019b), cdMOPSO (Raquel and Naval, 2005), MOMPSO (Dorado-Sevilla et al, 2021) and MODE/DMSM (Deb and Jain, 2014) are selected for comparative analysis. The parameter settings of three algorithms are consistent with the original literature.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to prove the superiority of the ICDMOPSO algorithm, NSGA-III (Miriam et al , 2021), MOEA/D (Li et al , 2019b), cdMOPSO (Raquel and Naval, 2005), MOMPSO (Dorado-Sevilla et al , 2021) and MODE/DMSM (Deb and Jain, 2014) are selected for comparative analysis. The parameter settings of three algorithms are consistent with the original literature.…”
Section: Simulation Experiments and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%