2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2007.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An interacting micro-crack damage model for failure of brittle materials under compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
180
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
13
180
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One approach is to appeal to averaging schemes that determine elastic constants like the selfconsistent schemes [1]. Another approach is to calculate the continuum response of micro-crack filled brittle materials from the Gibbs free energy function [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Although these models account for the physical mechanisms associated with cracks, they lack a physical crack growth law and hence a physical representation of the evolving damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One approach is to appeal to averaging schemes that determine elastic constants like the selfconsistent schemes [1]. Another approach is to calculate the continuum response of micro-crack filled brittle materials from the Gibbs free energy function [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Although these models account for the physical mechanisms associated with cracks, they lack a physical crack growth law and hence a physical representation of the evolving damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rate effects are particularly important at high loading rates where crack growth lags the loading. We note here that [9] have attempted to model crack growth in this loading regime by solving for a crack-speed that ensures that the dynamic stress intensity factor of the crack always equals the fracture toughness. However their work did not account for the fact that the fracture toughness of the material is itself sensitive to loading rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is in the spirit of classic fragmentation theories by Grady 23,27 and Glenn and Chudnovsky, 28 who treated fragmentation as a balance between kinetic, fracture, and strain energies. More recent numerical simulations such as those developed by Zhou et al, 29 Paliwal and Ramesh, 30 and Levy and Molinari 31 have shown promise for predicting brittle fragmentation behavior, but generally require a level of understanding of material defects and mechanical response which is currently unavailable for the hierarchical freeze-cast structures we consider here.…”
Section: Fragmentation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the shear stress along the joint face exceeds the friction, the rock mass will slide along the joint face. With the increase in compression, the wing cracks will begin to propagate from the joint tips at the direction of 70.5 • [26][27][28]; namely, the joints will propagate along the direction in which the tensile stress is maximum, as shown in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Sif Calculation Methods Of a Single Nonpersistently Closed Jomentioning
confidence: 99%