2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An inter-laboratory comparison of different analytical methods for the determination of monomethylmercury in various soil and sediment samples: A platform for method improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because mercury response is independent of the molecular composition, other volatile mercury-containing compounds, such as methyl mercury, phenyl mercury, or unknowns, can be quantified with an independent single-compound calibration. Thus, elemental mercury can be used to quantify other mercury-containing compounds that are either difficult to obtain or to avoid the use of highly toxic molecules. Among the many techniques for the determination of mercury, cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy (CVAAS) and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectroscopy (CVAFS) are most commonly employed. CVAAS and CVAFS are approved methods by health and environmental agencies, such as ASTM International, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), and others.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because mercury response is independent of the molecular composition, other volatile mercury-containing compounds, such as methyl mercury, phenyl mercury, or unknowns, can be quantified with an independent single-compound calibration. Thus, elemental mercury can be used to quantify other mercury-containing compounds that are either difficult to obtain or to avoid the use of highly toxic molecules. Among the many techniques for the determination of mercury, cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy (CVAAS) and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectroscopy (CVAFS) are most commonly employed. CVAAS and CVAFS are approved methods by health and environmental agencies, such as ASTM International, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), and others.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detectors combining plasma excitation with optical emission spectroscopy have been used to detect a wide variety of analytes with great success, including the measurement of organometallic mercuric compounds in environmental and biological matrices. Unlike the ubiquitous flame ionization detector (FID), which measures simple gas-phase carbon-containing ions created in a hydrogen flame, the atomic emission detector (AED) has much broader applicability. AED is based on detection of atomic emissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Figure 3, it can be shown that the comparison of NAA and XRF are having a good agreement with each other, as it can be seen that the most of the data plotted along x = y line. Several studies reported the comparison results of two analytical methods using the scatter plot on regression linear, visualization of the data facilitate agreement/disagreement of the data which then can be proved statistically using significance difference test (Du et al, 2013;Gemayel et al, 2017;Kodamatani et al, 2017). This showed that the NAA method has good reproducibility and in confirm with the XRF method.…”
Section: Validation Of Naa Analytical Methods Used For Elemental Char...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers, internal to SRS and international, have reported similar mercury contamination and carryover issues in the analysis of high-sulfur samples. 27 The soil, and therefore the municipal water, local to SRNL is highly humic-thereby imparting minor sulfur concentrations to the facility water, even after filtration and deionization. 28 The system contamination issue was not observed following exchange of facility deionized water for HPLC-grade reagent water.…”
Section: Contamination and Interferentsmentioning
confidence: 99%