2003
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889802022628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An intensity evaluation method:EVAL-14

Abstract: A re¯ection intensity integration method is presented based upon ab initio calculation of three-dimensional (x, y, 3) re¯ection boundaries from a few physical crystal and instrument parameters. It is especially useful in challenging circumstances, such as the case of a crystal that is far from spherical, anisotropic mosaicity, 1 2 peak splitting, interference from close neighbours, twin lattices or satellite re¯ections, and the case of streaks from modulated structures, all of which may frustrate the customary… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
919
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,136 publications
(920 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
919
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The crystal appeared to be non-merohedrally twinned with a twofold rotation about the a-axis as twin operation. This twin relationship was taken into account for the integration [38] and merging [39] of the reflections and the HKLF5 refinement. [40] 11 455 reflections were unique (R int = 0.071).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crystal appeared to be non-merohedrally twinned with a twofold rotation about the a-axis as twin operation. This twin relationship was taken into account for the integration [38] and merging [39] of the reflections and the HKLF5 refinement. [40] 11 455 reflections were unique (R int = 0.071).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data reduction was performed using eval-14 [17]. An analytical absorption correction was performed using the implementation in platon [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X-ray reflections were measured on a Nonius Kappa CCD diffractometer with rotating anode (graphite monochromator, l = 0.71073 ). Data were integrated with EvalCCD [29] using an accurate description of the experimental setup for the prediction of the reflection contours. Absorption correction and scaling were performed using SADABS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%