2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An intelligent warning model for early prediction of cardiac arrest in sepsis patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limitation of the current ML-based studies is that most studies build prediction models for specific types of patients and use a single ML algorithm for their proposed system. The authors of [42], [44], [51] [52] and [53] developed mortality-prediction models for specific patients such as kidney-failure patients. Although accurate results were obtained in these studies, the application of their models is limited to specific domains.…”
Section: B Ml-based Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitation of the current ML-based studies is that most studies build prediction models for specific types of patients and use a single ML algorithm for their proposed system. The authors of [42], [44], [51] [52] and [53] developed mortality-prediction models for specific patients such as kidney-failure patients. Although accurate results were obtained in these studies, the application of their models is limited to specific domains.…”
Section: B Ml-based Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With advances in algorithm technology, it is now possible to identify highly relevant features and discover new ways to utilize medical signals to improve the accuracy and functionality of prediction models to solve medical issues. Compared to prediction models of cardiac arrest generated using traditional methods such as regression method analysis or expert opinion, machine learning can achieve a better performance in many cases 9‐13 . In addition, current risk scores generated using traditional methods have limitations in clinical use due to their poor performance, low sensitivity, and/or a high false‐alarm rate 14 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many of these attributes were not valuable and insufficient for stratifying the onset of cardiac arrest 15 . Second, several studies have used machine learning to predict cardiac arrest in pediatric, 13 septic, 9 and ward patients, 12 however, no previous research has used machine learning to predict cardiac arrest in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Finally, although some models derived from machine learning algorithms can accurately predict cardiac arrest, most studies failed to generate a visualization risk score.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, various artificial intelligence (AI) applications have been gradually implemented in the medical field by using machine learning [5,6,7], resulting in more accurate results. There are two types of machine learning: unsupervised learning and supervised learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%