2016
DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i30/94554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Intelligent Technique based MRPID Controller for Controlling the Speed of an IPMSM Drive System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arumugom [60] An interesting application of neuro-fuzzy systems is described in Arumugom (2017) [60] where the authors attempt to design a DVR with energy conservation using a MIC and vibration energy harvester (VEH). Aruna [61] proposed in 2016 a hybrid method using ANFIS for the speed control of interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM). Their results demonstrate that their solution enables better disturbance rejection compared to the classic PID controller.…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arumugom [60] An interesting application of neuro-fuzzy systems is described in Arumugom (2017) [60] where the authors attempt to design a DVR with energy conservation using a MIC and vibration energy harvester (VEH). Aruna [61] proposed in 2016 a hybrid method using ANFIS for the speed control of interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM). Their results demonstrate that their solution enables better disturbance rejection compared to the classic PID controller.…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Year Method Application An interesting application of neuro-fuzzy systems is described in Arumugom (2017) [60] where the authors attempt to design a DVR with energy conservation using a MIC and vibration energy harvester (VEH). Aruna [61] proposed in 2016 a hybrid method using ANFIS for the speed control of interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM). Their results demonstrate that their solution enables better disturbance rejection compared to the classic PID controller.…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%