2018 Second International Conference on Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies (ICICCT) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icicct.2018.8473340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Intelligent Software defined Network Controller for preventing Distributed Denial of Service Attack

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [6], the authors used KNN, SVM, and Naïve Bayes to detect DDoS packets. KNN was most suitable with 97% accuracy, while SVM had 82% and Naïve Bayes 83%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [6], the authors used KNN, SVM, and Naïve Bayes to detect DDoS packets. KNN was most suitable with 97% accuracy, while SVM had 82% and Naïve Bayes 83%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 5, shows a comparison of the classification models from this research and other related works. SVM (DDoS, SDN) 82% [6] 86.85% 3.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Lstm Model With The Best Performing Linearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2018, Prakash et al used the Mininet tool to build a topology from four virtual hosts and two virtual switches in order to generate a dataset for ML classification purposes [3]. TCPDump tool is used to collect the network traffic, while the Hping3 tool is utilized to simulate DDoS attacks.…”
Section: B Reviewer-2: Comparison Of Existing Testbeds With Proposedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some previous efforts [3]- [8] have been tried to simulate the SDN network and generate an acceptable dataset, the existing datasets only outline a few types of attacks i.e. only focus on DoS/DDoS threats without considering the different attack classes existing in the SDN network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author used 11 different features in which only 5 were critical. In [14], the author used 6 features and labelled the traffic in the dataset for training. SVM, Naive Bayes, and k-Nearest Neighbours (KNN) have been used for the experiment while KNN had an accuracy of 97%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%