2016
DOI: 10.17743/jaes.2016.0016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Intelligent Interface for Drum Pattern Variation and Comparative Evaluation of Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, quantitative user studies from music editors' view are rarely seen. Related studies are mostly non-quantitative expert interviews [20,37]. In a recent study which evaluates the quality of automatic music transcription method for ethnomusicologists [18], the correlation between the transcription time and user-reported transcription effort is reported, and the results indicate the potential to perform quantitative editing tests for music generation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, quantitative user studies from music editors' view are rarely seen. Related studies are mostly non-quantitative expert interviews [20,37]. In a recent study which evaluates the quality of automatic music transcription method for ethnomusicologists [18], the correlation between the transcription time and user-reported transcription effort is reported, and the results indicate the potential to perform quantitative editing tests for music generation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hellmer et al [15] introduced methods to quantify the measures of microtiming of a drum track, which is also adopted in this work. Although not performance-related, there exist other works on drums, such as beat generation [16,17], drum sound synthesis [18,19] and interface design [20,21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%