2023
DOI: 10.3390/su15031862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Intelligent Health Care System in Fog Platform with Optimized Performance

Abstract: Cloud computing delivers services through the Internet and enables the deployment of a diversity of apps to provide services to many businesses. At present, the low scalability of these cloud frameworks is their primary obstacle. As a result, they are unable to satisfy the demands of centralized computer systems, which are based on the Internet of Things (IoT). Applications such as disease surveillance and tracking and monitoring systems, which are highly latency sensitive, demand the computation of the Big Da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare our method to the existing methodologies (viz., QRL AND DRL) using the performance metrics like precision, recall, f-measure, and prediction accuracy for determining the prevalence of heart disease. The precision, recall, f-measure and accuracy can be mathematically represented as [41][42][43][44] Γ— 100 (23) where 𝑇 𝑝 , 𝑇 𝑛 , 𝐹 𝑝 , 𝐹 𝑛 denote the true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative respectively. The notations π‘ƒπ‘Ÿ, 𝑅, 𝑓 βˆ’ π‘šπ‘’π‘Žπ‘ π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’, and 𝐴 denote the precision, recall, f-measure and accuracy of the model respectively.…”
Section: B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compare our method to the existing methodologies (viz., QRL AND DRL) using the performance metrics like precision, recall, f-measure, and prediction accuracy for determining the prevalence of heart disease. The precision, recall, f-measure and accuracy can be mathematically represented as [41][42][43][44] Γ— 100 (23) where 𝑇 𝑝 , 𝑇 𝑛 , 𝐹 𝑝 , 𝐹 𝑛 denote the true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative respectively. The notations π‘ƒπ‘Ÿ, 𝑅, 𝑓 βˆ’ π‘šπ‘’π‘Žπ‘ π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’, and 𝐴 denote the precision, recall, f-measure and accuracy of the model respectively.…”
Section: B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following [42], we can compute the energy consumption by the local computing IoT devices to offload the captured IoT data can be given as, β„° 𝑖 π‘™π‘œπ‘ = 𝜌(𝑓 𝑖 ) 2 𝑝 π‘‘π‘Žπ‘ π‘˜π‘  (17) From the above Eq. ( 17), the power coefficient pertaining to the architecture of the chip is denoted as 𝜌.…”
Section: E Energy Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following [ [32] , [33] , [34] ], we assume that the task arrivals to a certain fog node within set follow a Poisson process, which is represented by the parameter , which is the sum of all client processes with the fog node in the federated framework and can be given as Eq. (10) below: Furthermore, we model every fog node in set using an M/M/1 queuing model, and the resulting queuing delay, , is calculated as Eq.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smart cities have developed as centers of innovation that harness new technologies to address public health concerns. Specifically, the Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) technology has developed as the result of the convergence between artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) to offer a new paradigm to control pandemic diseases based on the data distributed across different geographical locations [ 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smart healthcare systems usually focus on collecting medical imaging datasets to be used to build AI solutions for pandemic diseases during outbreaks. This data is usually sourced from varied imaging modalities and acquired from different healthcare institutions in the same smart city or even different cities, leading to inherent variability and heterogeneity across domains of data [ 6 ]. This cross-domain/multi-site bias arises as a possible consequence of variability in the specifications of equipment, scanning protocols, patient demographics, disease manifestations, and other facets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%