Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.health.2023.100150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An intelligent algorithm for lung cancer diagnosis using extracted features from Computerized Tomography images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach automates lung cancer anatomical localization from PET/CT scans and classifies tumors with an average accuracy of 95.5%. N. Maleki et al [24] combined CNN with Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for initial lung cancer classification from CT images. Later, they applied Gradient Boosting (GB), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) on numerical features of the same image dataset as the second approach.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach automates lung cancer anatomical localization from PET/CT scans and classifies tumors with an average accuracy of 95.5%. N. Maleki et al [24] combined CNN with Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for initial lung cancer classification from CT images. Later, they applied Gradient Boosting (GB), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) on numerical features of the same image dataset as the second approach.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed DFD-Net discovered to better lung cancer detection results in improved accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. In [46], Computerized Tomography (CT) images of lung cancer patients for the early diagnosis of the disease. The raw CT images were CNN followed by ANN without any preprocessing.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other than that, adding to many features into classifier would harm its performance. Some researchers had stated that finding meaningful patterns is more challenging when there Lung cancer classification [17] Local binary pattern (LBP) based features Nodule vs non-nodule [18] Gabor features Lung cancer diagnosis [19] Wavelet features, texture features and histogram features Lung cancer prediction [20] Super pixels features Tumour vs non-tumour vs fundus (segmentation) [21] Morphological features, genomic features, and molecular features Tumour vs non-tumour…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%