1996
DOI: 10.1109/17.511840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An intelligent-agent framework for concurrent product design and planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Work group diversity shapes expectations of how others in the work group will behave (McGrath, Berdahl, & Arrow, 1995). In information-diverse groups, members have different experiences and work-relevant knowledge (Webber & Donahue, 2001), so they will expect that “other individuals may have significantly different experiences and perspectives on key issues and problems” (Milliken & Martins, 1996, p. 404), and will be encouraged to communicate actively with one another (e.g., Tan, Hayes, & Shaw, 1996). Moreover, the information-diverse group context, which implies varying experiences, modes of perception, and approaches to problems (Stahl, Mäkelä, Zander, & Maznevski, 2010), may cause members to doubt whether they possess sufficient expertise.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work group diversity shapes expectations of how others in the work group will behave (McGrath, Berdahl, & Arrow, 1995). In information-diverse groups, members have different experiences and work-relevant knowledge (Webber & Donahue, 2001), so they will expect that “other individuals may have significantly different experiences and perspectives on key issues and problems” (Milliken & Martins, 1996, p. 404), and will be encouraged to communicate actively with one another (e.g., Tan, Hayes, & Shaw, 1996). Moreover, the information-diverse group context, which implies varying experiences, modes of perception, and approaches to problems (Stahl, Mäkelä, Zander, & Maznevski, 2010), may cause members to doubt whether they possess sufficient expertise.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each agent had 'control' over a single design variable. The agents were able to observe each other through a blackboard approach [11]. The design task provided a global goal for the MAS.…”
Section: Uci Car Design Databasementioning
confidence: 99%