An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles

Abstract

Sexual selection is a major force driving the evolution of diverse reproductive traits. This evolutionary process is based on individual reproductive advantages that arise either through intrasexual competition or through intersexual choice and conflict. While classical studies of sexual selection focused mainly on differences in male mating success, more recent work has focused on the differences in paternity share that may arise through sperm competition or cryptic female choice whenever females mate with multiple males. Thus, an integrative view of sexual selection needs to encompass processes that occur not only before copulation (pre-mating), but also during copulation (peri-mating), as well as after copulation (post-mating), all of which can generate differences in reproductive success. By encompassing mechanisms of sexual selection across all of these sequential reproductive stages this review takes an integrative approach to sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), a particularly well-studied and economically important model organism. Tribolium flour beetles colonize patchily distributed grain stores, and juvenile and adult stages share the same food resources. Adults are highly promiscuous and female reproduction is distributed across an adult lifespan lasting approximately 1 year. While Tribolium males produce an aggregation pheromone that attracts both sexes, there appears to be little pre-mating discrimination among potential mates by either sex. However, recent work has revealed several peri-mating and post-mating mechanisms that determine how offspring paternity is apportioned among a female's mates. During mating, Tribolium females reject spermatophore transfer and limit sperm numbers transferred by males with low phenotypic quality. Although there is some conflicting evidence, male copulatory leg-rubbing appears to be associated with overcoming female resistance to insemination and does not influence a male's subsequent paternity share. Evidence suggests that Tribolium beetles have several possible post-mating mechanisms that they may use to bias paternity. Male sperm precedence has been extensively studied in Tribolium spp. and the related Tenebrio molitor, and several factors influencing male paternity share among a female's progeny have been identified. These include oviposition time, inter-mating interval, male strain/genotype, the mating regimen of a male's mother, male starvation, and tapeworm infection. Females exert muscular control over sperm storage, although there is no evidence to date that females use this to differentiate among mates. Females could also influence offspring paternity by re-mating with additional males, and T. castaneum females more readily accept spermatophores when they are re-mating with more attractive males. Additional work is needed to examine the possible roles played by both male and female accessory gland products in determining male paternity share. Sexual selection during pre-mating episodes may be reinforced or counteracted b...

Sexual conflict over mating in Gnatocerus cornutus ? Females prefer lovers not fighters

“…Attractiveness is frequently positively associated with courtship in insects, including flour beetles [7,[47][48][49][50]. Thus, we measured courtship rate (CR: number of courtship bouts per second, during a single successful courtship period) as a measure of courtship quality [7,46].…”

Epigenetics as a source of variation in comparative animal physiology – or – Lamarck is lookin' pretty good these days

“…Sperm storage often occurs in animals that have copulations with multiple males ('multiple paternity'), where the combination can create selective advantages (e.g. Vonhof et al, 2006;Fedina and Lewis, 2008;Griffiths et al, 2012). Indeed, in some species, fertile eggs of different ages fathered by different males can coexist in a female's oviduct.…”

Genetic trade-off between abilities to avoid attack and to mate: a cost of tonic immobility

“…This correlation between antipredator behaviour and general activity could potentially result in a trade-off between survival under predatory conditions and mating success under predator-free conditions. General activity when encountering mates is likely to be particularly important in species such as the flour beetle (Fedina & Lewis 2008), which does not exhibit male -male competition or male courtship before mating. To our knowledge, however, no empirical study has identified a genetic basis to such a trade-off, by actually comparing survival rates and mating success rates using individuals that exhibit different behavioural tendencies.…”