2017
DOI: 10.1108/jsm-06-2016-0222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrative transformative service framework to improve engagement in a social service ecosystem: the case of He Waka Tapu

Abstract: This research is part of a project titled "Involving the 'hard-to-reach' in making services reachable" and is solely funded by the New Zealand Government's Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment's "Health and Society Research Fund" during the period October 2013 to September 2016.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
114
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
7
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Mickelsson, 2013). This thrownness inherent to the sensing and choosing of activities is what consumers and end-users interpret as experiences (Hepi et al, 2017). To that end, the relationship between a subject and some object or environment must provide a context for the activities that take place.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Mickelsson, 2013). This thrownness inherent to the sensing and choosing of activities is what consumers and end-users interpret as experiences (Hepi et al, 2017). To that end, the relationship between a subject and some object or environment must provide a context for the activities that take place.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present article focuses on all four dimensions, that is, on service and consumer entities, in other words the actors within the framework, as well as on wellbeing outcomes (i.e., in this case both the intended and unintended effects) and on the environment (for example, public policy) (Anderson et al, 2013). Recent work has conceptualised wellbeing as value and this paper follows this notion (Black and Gallan, 2015;Hepi et al, 2017). Wellbeing outcome is the realised and experienced value by the actor which results from co-creative activities (Chen et al, 2019) in a particular sociocultural context via a process of sense and meaning making (Finsterwalder et al, 2017).…”
Section: Transformative Service Co-creationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, social services may centre on providing support for certain ethnic groups and members of society but do not actively target other ethnic minorities who may feel abandoned. Moreover, discrimination of certain actors might occur due to politics, power relations, or status among other factors (Hepi et al, 2017). This might result not only in unintentional negative effects and tensions (Kuppelwieser and Finsterwalder, 2016) but also in a decline in the health of the minority groups not in focus.…”
Section: Increasing and Decreasing Wellbeing And Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article aims to answer the research question of how an actor's perceived distance during a disaster can be overcome to improve individual wellbeing. In doing so, it contributes to service-related wellbeing literature as well as disaster-related publications by introducing the constructs of (a) an actor's distance; (b) an actor's safe zone; and (c) then embeds these concepts in the resources-challenges equilibrium (RCE) framework of wellbeing (Chen et al, 2020); to (d) advance more conceptual work to propel the service discipline (Vargo & Koskela-Huotari, 2020), but in particular the domain of Transformative Service Research (Anderson et al, 2013;Hepi et al, 2017;Kuppelwieser & Finsterwalder, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%