2005
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2601(05)37005-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrative theory of intergroup contact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

89
1,279
9
19

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,149 publications
(1,396 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
89
1,279
9
19
Order By: Relevance
“…Ignorance, misunderstanding, categorization, and competition increase the stereotypes and negative perceptions between groups [18]. On the other hand, mutual understanding and cooperative cooperation can reduce biases between groups.…”
Section: Theory Of Cooperative-competitivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ignorance, misunderstanding, categorization, and competition increase the stereotypes and negative perceptions between groups [18]. On the other hand, mutual understanding and cooperative cooperation can reduce biases between groups.…”
Section: Theory Of Cooperative-competitivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…9). This is only expected from the social psychological and wellestablished paradigm of prejudice reduction through intergroup contact (Allport 1954;Brown and Hewstone 2005;Tausch et al 2010) given its potential to deconstruct negative stereotypes, facilitate perspective taking and forgiveness, reduce threat and intergroup anxiety, and more importantly build trust.…”
Section: Conflict Transformation Conflict Resolution and Reconciliatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the collective action theorists even went as far as to argue that the promotion of strategies for emancipatory action to end structural inequalities against the oppressed minorities is incompatible with the promotion of co-operative relations between the groups and the well-established paradigm of prejudice reduction through intergroup contact (Brown and Hewstone 2005) because prejudice reduction interventions might be working towards regimenting a structural inequality in society by reconciling the weak group with an unfavourable for them status quo (Dixon et al 2012). Indeed the same mediators of prejudice reduction and reconciliation through intergroup contact (threats, intergroup anxiety, stereotyping) (Stephan et al 2009) could be used in the reverse direction in the collective action paradigm to enhance solidarity and cohesion within the dominated group, facilitating sacrifices (even giving one's life for the ingroup).…”
Section: Conflict Transformation Conflict Resolution and Reconciliatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the observation of or knowledge about an intergroup interaction elicits less intergroup anxiety (i.e., the feelings of uneasiness during intergroup interactions; Stephan, 2014) than a direct intergroup experience. Second, salience of intergroup categories, which facilitates the generalization of contact effects from encountered outgroup members to the whole outgroup (Brown & Hewstone, 2005), is likely to be higher for an external observer than for the actors involved in the contact situation, who are focused on interpersonal characteristics. Third, a single cross-group friendship or positive intergroup relation can be observed by many people, allowing extended contact to reduce prejudice on a larger scale than direct contact.…”
Section: Extended Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outgroup empathy (e.g., Brown & Hewstone, 2005;Pettigrew & Tropp, 2008) and outgroup trust (e.g., Kenworthy et al, 2015) have been identified as key mediators of the relationship between direct intergroup contact and reduced prejudice. Previous research has also shown that both outgroup empathy and outgroup trust mediate the relationship between extended contact and various outgroup perceptions and attitudes.…”
Section: Outgroup Empathy and Outgroup Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%