2015
DOI: 10.1111/jan.12727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrative review: understanding driving retirement decisions for individuals living with a dementia

Abstract: Aim. To synthesise primary research exploring decision making practices used to determine the time to retire from driving for individuals living with a dementia. Background. Driving requires complex cognitive and physical skills potentially compromised due to the progressive nature of dementia. Whilst on-road assessments are considered reliable indicators of driving capacity by clinicians, drivers with dementia disagree. Design. Integrative literature review informed by Whittemore & Knafl (2005). Data sources.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data appraisal was performed by two researchers using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Qualitative Research Checklist for qualitative studies [ 15 ] and National Health Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Appraisal Evidence Matrix for mixed methods and quantitative research [ 16 ]. Quantitative and mixed method studies were ranked as outlined by Andrew et al [ 17 ], (i.e. Excellent-A; Good-B; Satisfactory-C and Poor-4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data appraisal was performed by two researchers using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Qualitative Research Checklist for qualitative studies [ 15 ] and National Health Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Appraisal Evidence Matrix for mixed methods and quantitative research [ 16 ]. Quantitative and mixed method studies were ranked as outlined by Andrew et al [ 17 ], (i.e. Excellent-A; Good-B; Satisfactory-C and Poor-4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies exist on driving in individuals with MCI and AD; however, there have been few syntheses of the literature that examine how individuals with AD, their families, and providers determine when an individual with MCI or early-stage dementia is safe or unsafe to drive. Most recently, Andrew, Traynor, and Iverson (2016) conducted an integrative review on driving decision making in individuals with dementia. Their review primarily contained sources prior to the current review (they ended their search in 2012), and focused on how individuals make decisions to stop driving.…”
Section: Review Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to define when a patient with dementia is no longer fit to drive [ 13 ] because of large individual differences in the patterns of dysfunctions, related to the different aetiologies of dementia [ 14 , 15 ]. Therefore, the most appropriate moment to cease driving needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a proportion of patients with dementia continues to drive despite evidence of a decreased fitness to drive [ 20 ]. Some of these patients did not recall their fitness-to-drive assessment, others were not aware of their own cognitive impairment (due to decreased insight associated with dementia) or believed that their cognitive impairment did not affect driving safety [ 13 , 16 , 21 25 ]. According to the last group, the assessment process was ‘not fair’ and did not accurately reflect their fitness to drive [ 13 , 16 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation