Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/icalt.2007.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integrative Model for the Evaluation of E-portfolios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they only use information extracted from system log and do not consider the portfolio content. Bhattacharya and Novak propose in [8] an integrated model of portfolio assessment based on the activity theory, the concept of distributed cognition and the attributes of meaningful learning.…”
Section: Portfolio Assessment Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they only use information extracted from system log and do not consider the portfolio content. Bhattacharya and Novak propose in [8] an integrated model of portfolio assessment based on the activity theory, the concept of distributed cognition and the attributes of meaningful learning.…”
Section: Portfolio Assessment Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She has used the attributes of meaningful learning [4] for judging the appropriateness of the scenarios for building resilience. In addition attention was given on the development of individual characteristics such as…”
Section: Learning Environment Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] Author has also developed the generic rubric for formative assessment of learning during the process of Problem Based learning [4] and developed the criteria for assessment of selfreflection [5]. Detailed guidelines, i.e., the "ground rules" were developed for each assessment criterion and evaluated by experts in the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5] the use of student e-portfolios is proposed in science and technology both for group and individual tasks. The authors claim that students working in groups experienced a richer environment when compared to those working individually.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%