2010
DOI: 10.1108/02635571011038990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrative framework for supplier relationship management

Abstract: Purpose -There have been many studies on topics related to supplier relationship management (SRM), namely purchasing strategy, supplier selection and development, and collaboration with suppliers. However, these studies have not suggested a solution based on an integrative concept, as they focus only on domain-specific problems. To overcome this limitation, the purpose of this present paper is to suggest a framework for an integrative SRM system by analyzing comprehensive approaches to overall SRM functions. D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
88
0
24

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
88
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…One of them is that it must permit the upgrade of the evaluation system, as the criteria and supplier inclusion and exclusion, without having a result inconsistency generation (Lima Junior et al, 2014ª). However, the AHP (Park et al, 2010), ANP (Hsu et al, 2014;Liou et al, 2014), fuzzy AHP (Zeydan et al, 2011;Rezaei & Ortt, 2013), fuzzy ANP (Shirinfar & Haleh, 2011) and grey ANP (Dou et al, 2014) based methodologies can invert the ranking result ever when new criteria or alternatives are included or excluded. Further than its limitation, these techniques based methodologies have a limitation at quantities of suppliers, and it can be evaluated simultaneously comparing pair between the evaluated alternatives.…”
Section: Criteria and Techniques For Suppliers Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One of them is that it must permit the upgrade of the evaluation system, as the criteria and supplier inclusion and exclusion, without having a result inconsistency generation (Lima Junior et al, 2014ª). However, the AHP (Park et al, 2010), ANP (Hsu et al, 2014;Liou et al, 2014), fuzzy AHP (Zeydan et al, 2011;Rezaei & Ortt, 2013), fuzzy ANP (Shirinfar & Haleh, 2011) and grey ANP (Dou et al, 2014) based methodologies can invert the ranking result ever when new criteria or alternatives are included or excluded. Further than its limitation, these techniques based methodologies have a limitation at quantities of suppliers, and it can be evaluated simultaneously comparing pair between the evaluated alternatives.…”
Section: Criteria and Techniques For Suppliers Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As ilustrated in Figure 1, Park et al (2010) structured source management activities as a process composed by four main steps. The first one consists in the source strategies formulation, which involves decisions, as to have an intern made production or to outsource any compound (make or buy), to use one or multiple suppliers to each outsourced item, to divide the suppliers base according the item type, among others.…”
Section: Supplier Evaluation and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The benefits include decreasing risk, reducing costs and leadtime, as well as joint development and establishment of joint goals (Zelbst et al, 2010;Koh et al, 2007;Cheng et al, 2010;Park, Shin, & Chang, 2010). Thus, it is strategic to involve the supplier from the beginning of the process, and 95% of the respondents said that they conduct this practice.…”
Section: Theoretical Principles and Survey Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SRM is focused on maximizing the value of the relationship between organizations and suppliers by providing an integrated set of management tools in order to interact organization with its suppliers. The strategic objective of SRM is to collaborate with suppliers so that a company can produce new and efficient products [13]. SRM is a category of supply chain which can deliver many competitive advantage contributions through leveraging the business processes in supply chain as well as facilitating the acceleration of product development cycles and introduction of new products into the market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%