2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-7381-8_48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integrated Structure-Control Optimization Method for Rigid-Flexible Coupling Positioning Stage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The design requirements of the arm frame: its structure and size must meet the requirements of the workspace; according to the force characteristics and structural characteristics of the arm, the cross-section shape of the arm should be reasonably selected and the materials with high strength and light weight should be adopted. Minimize the self-weight of the arm and the inertia and torque relative to the hinge rotation axis, thereby reducing the load of the transmission mechanism: reducing the dynamic load and collision during operation, and increasing the response speed of the action; minimize the motion error caused by mechanical clearance, so that the stiffness and accuracy of machinery are improved [5] . As shown in figure 4.…”
Section: Arm Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design requirements of the arm frame: its structure and size must meet the requirements of the workspace; according to the force characteristics and structural characteristics of the arm, the cross-section shape of the arm should be reasonably selected and the materials with high strength and light weight should be adopted. Minimize the self-weight of the arm and the inertia and torque relative to the hinge rotation axis, thereby reducing the load of the transmission mechanism: reducing the dynamic load and collision during operation, and increasing the response speed of the action; minimize the motion error caused by mechanical clearance, so that the stiffness and accuracy of machinery are improved [5] . As shown in figure 4.…”
Section: Arm Designmentioning
confidence: 99%