2022
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integrated Clinical‐MR Radiomics Model to Estimate Survival Time in Patients With Endometrial Cancer

Abstract: Background Determination of survival time in women with endometrial cancer using clinical features remains imprecise. Features from MRI may improve the survival estimation allowing improved treatment planning. Purpose To identify clinical features and imaging signatures on T2‐weighted MRI that can be used in an integrated model to estimate survival time for endometrial cancer subjects. Study Type Retrospective. Population Four hundred thirteen patients with endometrial cancer as training (N = 330, 66.41 ± 11.4… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, 611 cases were recruited as training datasets; the inclusion criteria regarding MRI were replicated from a previous study [ 25 ]. For this classification study, the specific inclusion criteria regarding clinical data were: (1) availability of DMI (cancer stage IA vs. IB) information, information on LVSI, histological risk score, and histological type, and (2) no other type of co-existing cancer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Initially, 611 cases were recruited as training datasets; the inclusion criteria regarding MRI were replicated from a previous study [ 25 ]. For this classification study, the specific inclusion criteria regarding clinical data were: (1) availability of DMI (cancer stage IA vs. IB) information, information on LVSI, histological risk score, and histological type, and (2) no other type of co-existing cancer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four subjects were scanned with 3.0 T scanners, while the remaining majority of the 406 subjects were scanned with a 1.5 T scanner. The independent holdout dataset included 102 patients collected from 2017 to 2019, and 82 cases were included in the final analysis once the aforementioned inclusion criteria were applied [ 25 ]. Table 1 shows the clinical target/response variable and the number of cases for the classification studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In terms of DFS in EC, few studies have been published. Nakajo et al created a [ 18 F]-FDG PET-based radiomic ML model and obtained an AUC of 0.89 for the prediction of PFS [ 59 ], while other studies using MRI-based models alone or combined with clinical data obtained mean AUCs varying between 0.62 and 0.85 [ 67 , 68 , 69 ]. To complete this knowledge gap, our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CT-based radiomics in predicting recurrences in EC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%