2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated safety prognosis model for complex system based on dynamic Bayesian network and ant colony algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Markov chains) or approximate methods such as meta-heuristics or techniques of artificial intelligence (Hu et al [49]). In all cases, the qualitative characterization of a model will necessarily involve elicitation of experts (Knegtering and Pasman [48], Zahra et al [41]). The advantage of using a decision aid is to be able to use a model repeatedly to make decisions, choose options or set diagnostics where consequences are major and possibly spread out over time and past experience is of little help, all while minimizing the introduction of bias.…”
Section: Integrated Risk Management a Promising Avenuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Markov chains) or approximate methods such as meta-heuristics or techniques of artificial intelligence (Hu et al [49]). In all cases, the qualitative characterization of a model will necessarily involve elicitation of experts (Knegtering and Pasman [48], Zahra et al [41]). The advantage of using a decision aid is to be able to use a model repeatedly to make decisions, choose options or set diagnostics where consequences are major and possibly spread out over time and past experience is of little help, all while minimizing the introduction of bias.…”
Section: Integrated Risk Management a Promising Avenuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…et al [41], Tixier et al [42]) in laboratory experiments (Dempsey et al [43]) or using digital human modeling (Illmann et al [44], Demirel and Duffy [3], Fritzsche et al [45], Neumann and Medbo [46], Cimino et al [47]) have been used to complete the comprehension, formalizing and modeling of the decisional subsystem of the system under study. Quantitative or qualitative characterization of such a model can be achieved using Bayesian methods (Knegtering and Pasman [48], Hu et al [49]) or multi-criteria methods such as AHP (analytical hierarchy process) (Saaty, [98]) or ELECTRE, when specific events can be associated with risks and probabilities of their occurrence can be estimated. When probabilities of occurrence cannot be estimated, consideration must be given to using combinatory or continuous optimization algorithms, depending on the nature of the system under study.…”
Section: Integrated Risk Management a Promising Avenuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A DBN is a type of BN which is used to model time-series data by introducing relevant temporal dependencies, so as to describe the dynamic behavior of random variables (Hu et al, 2011). A DBN consists of a sequence of time slices and temporal links.…”
Section: Dynamic Bayesian Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of these are relevant in situations where experience is limited and the causal relationship is not well understood. In addition, current DBN based models assume that parameters of conditional probability and failure rates are time-invariant (Cai et al, 2013;Hu et al, 2011) , but in practices many failures in mechanical equipment follow other probability distribution, e.g. Weibull.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17 The dynamic problem is represented with DBNs and the outcome of the analysis is how system or component reliability behaves in time. 18,19 The impact of maintenance of an element at a specific time on this behavior is also reported in some of them. 20,21 However optimization of maintenance activities (i.e., finding a minimum cost plan) 22 using DBNs is rarely considered which is another main motivation for this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%