2012
DOI: 10.1080/0309877x.2011.590584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated professionalism in further education: a time for phronesis?

Abstract: The aim of this article is to examine the role taken by the Institute for Learning (IfL) in England to promote the nature of professionalism in the lifelong learning sector. It raises the possibility that the decisions taken by the IfL, since its inception in 2002, are leading to the de-professionalisation of teachers. It is argued that what is now needed is a new professionalism that is driven by the practice of phronesis: wise practical reasoning, based on judgement and wisdom, and that accords with the cent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transformation of learning into a business (Ainley and Bailey, 1997), with its attendant performance criteria and target setting, has exercised a level of control over teachers which has undermined their sense of professionalism and led them to question what constitutes a 'good' teacher under new managerialist regimes (Shain and Gleeson, 1999). Such regimes have blurred the distinction between the professional and manager allowing managerialism to dominate and drive sector thinking (Plowright and Barr, 2012). This has been exacerbated by the rhetoric of competitiveness which dominates the post-compulsory sector (Avis, 2007), and has intensified to the extent that it is not only colleges which are in competition with each other, but even the departments within them (Garbett et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transformation of learning into a business (Ainley and Bailey, 1997), with its attendant performance criteria and target setting, has exercised a level of control over teachers which has undermined their sense of professionalism and led them to question what constitutes a 'good' teacher under new managerialist regimes (Shain and Gleeson, 1999). Such regimes have blurred the distinction between the professional and manager allowing managerialism to dominate and drive sector thinking (Plowright and Barr, 2012). This has been exacerbated by the rhetoric of competitiveness which dominates the post-compulsory sector (Avis, 2007), and has intensified to the extent that it is not only colleges which are in competition with each other, but even the departments within them (Garbett et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plowright and Barr (2012), however, identify a real shift in the professional agenda for teacher educators in LLL, precisely regarding a codification of professional conduct and, they suggest, identity. The authors argue that the movement over the last decade, since the creation of LLL"s professional body, the IfL, in 2002, has led to the imposition of a highly artificial code of "ethics" by the sector"s professional body and to unthinking managerial, micro-controlled behaviour.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, education, like health and social care settings, exists in a culture of corporate ideology and financial acumen that shapes how it functions; it is the outcome not the process of education that is the master of the university setting (Goodman 2014). The challenge for the HE sector (Plowright and Barr 2012), in tandem with health and social care sector (Freidson 2001), is to create a culture that will facilitate students and staff to confront and address the forces of managerialism that impact on nurturing caring values in these work environments and through this action, create 'a world in which it will be easier to love' (Freire 2000, 40). This requires a questioning and resilient student, prepared to challenge the status the quo and address social dichotomies: in the present neoliberal marketplace, built on an ideology of growth, greed and individualism, caring values in a public sector workplace makes an uncomfortable bedfellow.…”
Section: The Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%