2020
DOI: 10.3390/su12104295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integrated Planning Framework for Sustainable Water and Energy Supply

Abstract: This study aims to reveal the economic, technical, and environmental impacts of different system configurations (centralized or decentralized, components, and technologies) on transition plans to achieve a higher share of renewable energy and desalination supplies for regions facing water scarcity. The main contribution of this research is the comparative evaluation of on-grid decentralized or distributed renewable-powered desalination systems for sustainable water and energy supply planning. Applying a novel … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For i = 5% and n = 75: [59], and by considering three different scenarios for the annual reduction percentages in water production costs to be: Operation As Usual (OAU), where annual reduction costs for RO and MED technologies are (5.8%/annum) and (3.9%/annum), respectively [78]; Lower Than Usual (LTU), where annual reduction costs for RO and MED technologies are (3%/annum) and (2%/annum), respectively and Higher Than Usual (HTU), where annual reduction costs for RO and MED technologies are (10%/annum) and (8%/annum), respectively. The following values shown in Figures 6-8 represent the scenarios for an SLR of 1 m.…”
Section: Slr (M)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For i = 5% and n = 75: [59], and by considering three different scenarios for the annual reduction percentages in water production costs to be: Operation As Usual (OAU), where annual reduction costs for RO and MED technologies are (5.8%/annum) and (3.9%/annum), respectively [78]; Lower Than Usual (LTU), where annual reduction costs for RO and MED technologies are (3%/annum) and (2%/annum), respectively and Higher Than Usual (HTU), where annual reduction costs for RO and MED technologies are (10%/annum) and (8%/annum), respectively. The following values shown in Figures 6-8 represent the scenarios for an SLR of 1 m.…”
Section: Slr (M)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…costs to be: Operation As Usual (OAU), where annual reduction costs for RO and MED technologies are (5.8%/annum) and (3.9%/annum), respectively [78]; Lower Than Usual (LTU), where annual reduction costs for RO and MED technologies are (3%/annum) and (2%/annum), respectively and Higher Than Usual (HTU), where annual reduction costs for RO and MED technologies are (10%/annum) and (8%/annum), respectively. The following values shown in Figures 6-8 From the previous figure, it can be clearly observed how the learning curve for desalination technologies is expected to significantly decrease the production costs of water by all technologies and under all scenarios.…”
Section: Slr (M)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These desalination plants can effectively operate without energy storage systems (mostly batteries), as water can be desalinated based on energy availability and stored as the final product [95]. This direct consumption of renewable energy increases the efficiency of the whole system because storage systems such as battery systems have a typical charge-cycle efficiency of 75% to 98% [5]. Furthermore, high ambiance temperatures, which are common in regions facing water scarcity, increase the self-discharge rate and performance of batteries.…”
Section: System Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen in Table 2, the number of studies that investigated the centralized water system and the decentralized water system are very few. Study [5] developed a novel methodology for the sustainable planning of energy and water supplies with a share of renewables and desalination. This study conducted a comprehensive comparison between centralized and decentralized desalination systems and their technical, economic and environmental impacts on the energy and water sectors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent paper published in 2020 [35] reports a study about the economic, technical, and environmental impacts of different desalination system configurations (centralized or decentralized, components, and technologies) on transition plans to achieve a higher share of renewable energy and desalination supplies for regions facing water scarcity. The analysis forecasts a reduction of LCOW from the current value of $2.19-2.46/m 3 to $0.79-1.01/m 3 in 2040.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%