2022
DOI: 10.3390/su141912429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integrated Model for the Geohazard Accident Duration on a Regional Mountain Road Network Using Text Data

Abstract: A mountainous road network with special geological and meteorological characteristics is extremely vulnerable to nonrecurring accidents, such as traffic crashes and geohazard breakdowns. Geohazard accidents significantly impact the operation of the road network. Timely and accurate prediction of how long geohazard accidents will last is of significant importance to regional traffic safety management and control schemes. However, none of the existing studies focus on the topic of predicting geohazard accident d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the results obtained in scenarios with binary predictor variables, in this case, the performance of Random Survival Forest is superior compared to the Survival Support Vector Machine with 3 kinds of Kernel Functions and applies to all n used in this study, then in terms of performance in proceed by SSVM(ADD), SSVM(RBF) and SSVM(LIN) methods. This is also in accordance with research that was conducted by [19] & [20] in real case with mixed predictor variables, the result was that RSF was better at predicting compared to CPH and SSVM.…”
Section: Simulation Using Mixed Predictor Variablessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In contrast to the results obtained in scenarios with binary predictor variables, in this case, the performance of Random Survival Forest is superior compared to the Survival Support Vector Machine with 3 kinds of Kernel Functions and applies to all n used in this study, then in terms of performance in proceed by SSVM(ADD), SSVM(RBF) and SSVM(LIN) methods. This is also in accordance with research that was conducted by [19] & [20] in real case with mixed predictor variables, the result was that RSF was better at predicting compared to CPH and SSVM.…”
Section: Simulation Using Mixed Predictor Variablessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Unlike Kaplan-Meier curves and logrank tests, which are commonly used for monovariate analysis, Cox can be used for multifactor survival analysis. Moreover, Cox can include categorical variables (e.g., gender) and also numerical variables (e.g., age), whereas Kaplan-Meier curves and logrank tests can only include categorical variables [28,29]. Cox has a wider application since it extends survival analysis to simultaneously evaluate the effect of numerous risk factors on survival time [30].…”
Section: Model Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%