An Integrated Framework for Prioritizing Software Specifications in Requirements Engineering

Gambo, Ishaya; Ikono, Rhoda; Achimugu, Philip; Soriyan, Abimbola

doi:10.14257/ijseia.2018.12.1.03

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In each group 15 participants randomly selected from 65 sets of participants to increase accuracy in results. The reason to select these approaches for comparison was based on their relevance in the existing literature [4, 33–35 ]. AHP is a statistical method to prioritise requirements in pair‐wise manner and parameters used for evaluation are import (relevant to stakeholders’ perspective), cost (different types of requirements cost like development, business, maintenance etc.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…CV prioritises requirements in relation to the value of requirements from 1 to 100 and describes results in ratio with equal opportunity to stakeholders. Wiegers detect priorities based on relative weights of risk, benefits, cost and penalty [33–35 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hence, multiple perspectives based on business, customer and technical prioritisation algorithm provided in [29 ], for solution‐oriented application requirements. Similarly, some other researchers have also presented prioritisation techniques to resolve issues by appropriate selection, specification, cost‐effective and decision‐making processes to reduce failure in systems after implementations [30–35 ].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Aspect‐based requirements mining technique to improve prioritisation process: multi‐stakeholder perspective

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Requirement prioritisation and selection is an essential activity in modern‐day large software development. Optimal prioritisation process is critical for successful implementation and release planning in a software development project. Requirement prioritisation becomes more challenging in projects having large sets of requirements and stakeholders, having diverse perspectives resulting in irrelevancy and ambiguity during features extraction. This study aims to improve requirement prioritisation process using text mining and clustering techniques for accurate extraction of features and requirement prioritisation in multi‐stakeholder context. The proposed framework developed to avoid incompleteness in requirements and disagreement among development teams and stakeholders. Thus, the proposed framework compared with other requirement prioritisation techniques (i.e. Analytical Heretical Process, Commutative Voting and Wiegers) to highlight the significance of the proposed framework while conducting an experimental study. The results show that the proposed framework outperformed the traditional techniques and enhanced the prioritisation process with complete semantic information of extracted features and taking into account the diverse perspective of stakeholders.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Aspect‐based requirements mining technique to improve prioritisation process: multi‐stakeholder perspective

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Untuk mengatasi kelemahan AHP ter-sebut, maka dilakukan integrasi AHP dengan teori fuzzy. Fuzzy dapat diadopsi untuk membantu pengambilan keputusan yang obyektif (Darko et al, 2019) (Gambo et al, 2018). Fuzzy-AHP (F-AHP) secara efektif memperbaiki subjektivitas dan ketidaktepatan pada teknik AHP dan memecahkan masalah hierarki yang berorientasi pada bobot, sehingga dapat memperbaiki proses pengambilan keputusan (Abusaeed et al, 2023).…”

Section: Fuzzy Ahpunclassified

Literatur Review: Penerapan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process Sebagai Teknik Prioritas Kebutuhan Perangkat Lunak

Izzati

2023

intek

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AHP is one of the popular techniques used in prioritizing software requirements. This study aims to determine the application of AHP as a software requirements priority technique by reviewing thirty literature related to the application of AHP as a software requirements prioritization technique pub-lished in 2017 to 2023. The results of the study explain that the application of AHP has several ad-vantages, but on the other hand AHP also has some drawbacks. Over time, a number of literatures have discussed the development of AHP which aims to minimize weaknesses in the application of AHP. The development of AHP is by integrating AHP with Planning Game, MoSCoW, QFD, and Fuzzy. In addition, development is also carried out by adding new algorithms, namely ReDCCahp and Enhanced AHP. The results of this study provide a useful reference for researchers and practitioners in the field of requirements engineering in prioritizing software requirements using AHP.

show abstract

“…1. In the software engineering literature, the component-based software development (CBSD) approach has got the attention of industry and researchers in the last decade, which focuses on the composition of components as elementary blocks for product development [3,[12][13][14][15][16][17]. Additionally, CBSD provides systematic reuse of the components which significantly improves the effectiveness of development teams.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards Aspect Based Components Integration Framework for Cyber-Physical System

Ali¹,

Hafeez²,

Bilal³

et al. 2022

Computers, Materials &Amp; Continua

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) comprise interactive computation, networking, and physical processes. The integrative environment of CPS enables the smart systems to be aware of the surrounding physical world. Smart systems, such as smart health care systems, smart homes, smart transportation, and smart cities, are made up of complex and dynamic CPS. The components integration development approach should be based on the divide and conquer theory. This way multiple interactive components can reduce the development complexity in CPS. As reusability enhances efficiency and consistency in CPS, encapsulation of component functionalities and a well-designed user interface is vital for the better end-user's Quality of Experience (QoE). Thus, incorrect interaction of interfaces in the cyber-physical system causes system failures. Usually, interface failures occur due to false, and ambiguous requirements analysis and specification. Therefore, to resolve this issue semantic analysis is required for different stakeholders' viewpoint analysis during requirement specification and components analysis. This work proposes a framework to improve the CPS component integration process, starting from requirement specification to prioritization of components for configurable. For semantic analysis and assessing the reusability of specifications, the framework uses text mining and case-based reasoning techniques. The framework has been tested experimentally, and the results show a significant reduction in ambiguity, redundancy, and irrelevancy, as well as increasing accuracy of interface interactions, component selection, and higher user satisfaction.

show abstract

An Integrated Framework for Prioritizing Software Specifications in Requirements Engineering

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

Aspect‐based requirements mining technique to improve prioritisation process: multi‐stakeholder perspective

Aspect‐based requirements mining technique to improve prioritisation process: multi‐stakeholder perspective

Literatur Review: Penerapan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process Sebagai Teknik Prioritas Kebutuhan Perangkat Lunak

Towards Aspect Based Components Integration Framework for Cyber-Physical System

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About