2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated framework for multi-objective optimization of building performance: Carbon emissions, thermal comfort, and global cost

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As research and the evolution of algorithms progress, scholars are also experimenting with a variety of algorithms like NSGA-III [37,61], SPEA-II [62], HypE [63], MOPSO, and MOEA/E [41,64]. Usman, M., and others achieved optimal passive design for single-family homes in different climates by coupling the NSGA-III genetic algorithm with the building energy simulation tool TRNSYS [65].…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As research and the evolution of algorithms progress, scholars are also experimenting with a variety of algorithms like NSGA-III [37,61], SPEA-II [62], HypE [63], MOPSO, and MOEA/E [41,64]. Usman, M., and others achieved optimal passive design for single-family homes in different climates by coupling the NSGA-III genetic algorithm with the building energy simulation tool TRNSYS [65].…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of architecture, multi-objective optimization can be linked with energy consumption simulation software such as EnergyPlus, Ecotect, and TRNSYS and with software like MATLAB or Python to focus on optimizing energy savings, carbon emissions, and economic performance [36]. Chen and others have developed an optimization framework on the Python platform to simulate the minimum carbon emissions, indoor discomfort hours, and overall costs of buildings [37]. Ascione and colleagues integrated EnergyPlus and MATLAB tools to optimize the energy consumption, thermal comfort, economic, and environmental impacts of office buildings, obtaining Pareto frontier solutions [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional manual design methods struggle to match the precision and speed mandated by these visionary ventures. Furthermore, structural optimization and automation play a pivotal role in crafting environmentally sustainable structures with reduced carbon footprints, addressing the construction industry's growing sustainability concerns [65]. This push drives architects and engineers to explore sustainable materials, lightweight structures, and energy-efficient designs, aligning with The AEC sector's landscape is also witnessing a surge in innovative architectural projects, demanding cutting-edge optimization and automation to address complex geometries and load-bearing prerequisites.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Current State-of-the-art Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Automation in Construction journal published the most automating structural design optimization research (33 articles). This journal assumes a pivotal role in driving innovation across AEC practices and fostering the adoption of Construction sustainable structures with reduced carbon footprints, addressing the construction industry's growing sustainability concerns [65]. This push drives architects and engineers to explore sustainable materials, lightweight structures, and energy-efficient designs, aligning with the global thrust towards eco-friendly construction practices.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Current State-of-the-art Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases, the equivalent cost of pollutants is accounted for in the main economic goal (Setlhaolo et al 2017) or their amount in tons constitutes an alternative or additional objective function of the optimization problem (Fiorini and Aiello 2018;Brahman et al 2015;Tabar et al 2017;Imran et al 2020). The emissions tied to the energy consumption is commonly assessed using the average CO 2 -EI of the generation mix, either defined as a constant (Chen et al 2022;Setlhaolo et al 2017;Imran et al 2020;Tabar et al 2017;Brahman et al 2015) or as a hourly value (Fiorini andAiello 2018, 2019b). However, the generation output of the power plants composing the generation mix does not adjust evenly to a load variation owning to multiple technical and economic factors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%